I just tell it like it is. I say hd's are built better with nicer quality and details all the time. Said it many many times. But i also say i feel they aren't that reliable and i think a triumph will out handle them. i get razzed for saying anything negitive about them by those who have hd's, but they never seem to notice the fact i also said the build quality beats the heck out of triumph. that should tell you something.....it tells you i'm not bashing, i'm telling you what i actually think !

So what am i supposed to say? Everything about them is better? can't there be any faults, or at least IMO w/o being called a basher? I say negitive things about my speedy all the time. Doesn't mean i don't love it. I think words like bashing need to be defined. It should be defined as unfounded negitivity towards something because you are simply biased. saying it like it is can be defined as describing what you have read and experienced and heard about something. But instead you can't be honest w/o being labeled a basher? i say lighten up guys ! if you tell me hd's build quality is much better than my speedy i won't call YOU a basher.....i'll agree ! Give me the same simple respect.

point is, what do you want others to say......do you want them to lie or be politically correct towards hd's, or do you wanna hear what they rfeel is the truth as they see it?