Quote:

Bottom line Benny...I agree with you.

"They" can ban picketing in front of family planning clinics.

"They" can ban advertisements for cigarettes on TV.

"They" can ban THIS!

And I for one, DON'T have a problem with it.

NOW....if only "they" would ban these insultingly STUPID, IRRESPONSIBLE, INNUENDO-RIDDEN, and out and out DECEITFUL Political Campaign "ADVERSITIZING" on television before elections.....I'd die a HAPPY AMERICAN!

And just THINK of all the money (85% of ALL campaign funds go to this practice of PAID SPEECH...NOT FREE SPEECH) a BAN on THIS CRAP would save. NOT to MENTION the corrupting factor that the "Mother's Milk Of Politics" creates!!!

Cheers,
Dwight
(now...I better stop...I'm gettin' a little "heated")

That's right, we'd be much better off if we left the discussion of issues and political argument to CBS, NBC, ABC, The New York Times, Washington Post, Newsweek and the like. Who do these politicians think they are spending money to make their arguments directly to the people when they should be letting the unbiased, balanced and politically neutral members of the press be the final arbiters of what is true and right. We need to keep interest groups and individuals out of the process and let our media betters tell us what to think. The fewer voices the better.

We all like to think of ourselves as rugged individualists. But when push comes to shove most of us are sheep who do what we are told. Worst of all, a lot of us become unpaid agents of whoever is controlling the agenda by enforcing the current dogma on the few rugged individualists who actually exist.