 Radiator coolant, MAYBE.
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937
Loquacious
|
OP
Loquacious
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937 |
Here's an interesting read from July, 2013 issue of Hot Rod Magazine. Complete article: Glycol or Water: Which is the Better Coolant? The specific heat capacity of ethylene glycol-based water solutions is less than that of pure water; in a 50% solution, ethylene glycol's specific heat capacity compared with pure water is DECREASED at least 20% at 36 degrees and about 17% at 200 degrees. Propylene glycol, another common coolant, has an even lower specific heat. Assuming a 100-gpm (gallons/minute) coolant flow rate and an energy loss through the coolant system of 189.5 hp, the water temperature increase would be 10 degrees, the ethylene glycol water mix would gain 20 degrees, and the propylene glycol would gain 33.3 degrees. Compensating for the reduced heat capacity of coolant/water mixes would require circulating more fluid through the system. Assuming a fixed amount of circulating fluid and radiator capacity, running 100% water would be the most efficient coolant in terms of it's ability to conduct heat with minimal temperature rise. In other words, of all common liquids, water requires the most heat energy to change it's temperature. However, there are also differences in the vapor point of the three different coolants. Ethylene glycol and propylene glycol have higher vapor points and therefore can absorb heat at higher temperatures without boiling. Yet even with it's lower vapor point, water STILL carries more heat per unit. Don't forget that the coolant is just one part of the cooling-system "team". You can raise water's effective vapor point by using a higher-pressure radiator cap. For every pound of increased system pressure, water's boiling point goes up by 3 degrees. Higher boiling points also reduce evaporation losses, water-pump cavitation, and heat-soak-induced after-boil. You can get away with a higher system pressure by using a quality aluminum radiator that's rated for higher pressure than is a brass/copper radiator. Aluminum radiators can take more pressure because their tensile strength is greater than brass-this lets an aluminum unit use tubes with larger cross sections and thinner walls. A larger tube also has more wall-surface area, resulting in improved heat transfer. Bottom line: A large-tube aluminum radiator filled with pure water and using at least a 20-psi cap is BY FAR the best heat-transfer setup, provided the vehicle is not subject to freezing conditions. Be sure to add a corrosion inhibitor when running pure water. HOTROD.COM/ Marlan-Davis I can testify to this, as living in Florida all my adult life, my vehicles are filled with water in aluminum, four-core, high performance radiators with 16 psi or higher caps. I've only had to drain my radiators/block about once every 5-10 years due to extended (five or more hours) temp's below freezing. Not that hard, get motor to operating temp and open the radiator drain petcock. When the 6:00 am warm-up hits, re-fill, warm to operating temp., and recheck after burp. Again, once in 5-10 years. Of course, this info. is useless to anyone further north than Ocala. 
And you may see me tonight
With an illegal smile
J. Prine
|
|
|
 Re: Radiator coolant, MAYBE.
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,669
Learned Hand
|
Learned Hand
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,669 |
Nah, I'm just gonna put FINS on EVERYTHING!
|
|
|
 Re: Radiator coolant, MAYBE.
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937
Loquacious
|
OP
Loquacious
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937 |
Quote:
Nah, I'm just gonna put FINS on EVERYTHING!
 Couldn't hurt! (and it would shut you-know-who up) 
And you may see me tonight
With an illegal smile
J. Prine
|
|
|
 Re: Radiator coolant, MAYBE.
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937
Loquacious
|
OP
Loquacious
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937 |
Well, NOTHIN' could do THAT. But it would eliminate ONE rant. 
And you may see me tonight
With an illegal smile
J. Prine
|
|
|
 Re: Radiator coolant, MAYBE.
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,669
Learned Hand
|
Learned Hand
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,669 |
Actually I think it would just encourage him even more. 
|
|
|
 Re: Radiator coolant, MAYBE.
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,393 Likes: 1
Second Wind
|
Second Wind
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,393 Likes: 1 |
I think it was always called antifreeze because it prevents the water from freezing at low temps. I dont think it has anything to do with improving any cooling ability. I use to always run water in the summer and add antifreeze in the winter when I lived up north.
Last edited by locopony; 05/29/2013 8:26 PM.
I have no faith in human perfectability. I think that human exertion will have no appreciable effect upon humanity. Man is now only more active - not more happy - nor more wise, than he was 6000 years ago.
Edgar Allan Poe
|
|
|
 Re: Radiator coolant, MAYBE.
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937
Loquacious
|
OP
Loquacious
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937 |
Quote:
I think it was always called antifreeze because it prevents the water from freezing at low temps. I dont think it has anything to do with improving any cooling ability. I use to always run water in the summer and add antifreeze in the winter when I lived up north.

Here, the labels call it "Winter Antifreeze/Summer coolant".
They advertise to protect from freezing by lowering the freezing temperature point (which they do), and to protect from boil over by raising the boiling point above that of water (which they do), which I believe is about 212 F., unpressurized.
With a pressurized system of 15-20 psi, the boiling point of water is way above the 212.
If your over 212, you BETTER shut it down.
They just DON'T advertise that they're NOT as efficient at removing heat from the motor as pure water under normal conditions. 
And you may see me tonight
With an illegal smile
J. Prine
|
|
|
 Re: Radiator coolant, MAYBE.
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 413
Adjunct
|
Adjunct
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 413 |
Quote:
..., which I believe is about 212 F., unpressurized.
With a pressurized system of 15-20 psi, the boiling point of water is way above the 212.
Not sure I'd call 16 degrees "way above", but it is higher. I guess it would depend "which" 16 degrees, how critical. From The Engineering Toolbox At 15 psi the boiling point is 213 deg F, 228 deg F @ 20 psi.
|
|
|
 Re: Radiator coolant, MAYBE.
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937
Loquacious
|
OP
Loquacious
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937 |
I guess I've always thought water boiled @ 212F in an open pan, When it appears that was the boiling point I've been taught in auto class (MANY decades ago) for a standard auto radiator.  The older I get, the more often sh1t like this happens.  Doesn't change the facts in the article though. Thank God it was written by someone presumably younger than I. 
And you may see me tonight
With an illegal smile
J. Prine
|
|
|
 Re: Radiator coolant, MAYBE.
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937
Loquacious
|
OP
Loquacious
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937 |
WAIT JUST ONE MINUTE HERE!  What's up with that chart!???  According to it, water will boil @ 80F with no pressure (0.5psi).  How come my spa, tub, and dish washing water ain't boiling at all times? Their over 100F straight out of the hot water tank. 
And you may see me tonight
With an illegal smile
J. Prine
|
|
|
 Re: Radiator coolant, MAYBE.
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937
Loquacious
|
OP
Loquacious
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937 |
Quote:
I guess I've always thought water boiled @ 212F in an open pan, When it appears that was the boiling point I've been taught in auto class (MANY decades ago) for a standard auto radiator. 
Wait, wait, I remember. Wasn't it FIRE that starts at 212F ??? 
Oh my, where's my pills? 
And you may see me tonight
With an illegal smile
J. Prine
|
|
|
 Re: Radiator coolant, MAYBE.
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937
Loquacious
|
OP
Loquacious
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937 |
Or was it 100C = 212F ? Now I can't sleep. 
And you may see me tonight
With an illegal smile
J. Prine
|
|
|
 Re: Radiator coolant, MAYBE.
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,720
Check Pants
|
Check Pants
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,720 |
Quote:
WAIT JUST ONE MINUTE HERE! 
What's up with that chart!??? 
According to it, water will boil @ 80F with no pressure (0.5psi). 
How come my spa, tub, and dish washing water ain't boiling at all times? Their over 100F straight out of the hot water tank.
Because atmospheric pressure at sea level is close to 15 Lbs PSI? You would have to be in space or a vacuum chamber to have zero pressure. Wait a minute, your just joking around, aren't you.
|
|
|
 Re: Radiator coolant, MAYBE.
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937
Loquacious
|
OP
Loquacious
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937 |
Kidding? No. Just trying to see if that chart from engineeringtoolbox Included standard atmospheric pressure in their graph, or not. And yes, water usually boils @ 212F, AND 100C = 212F. NOW it comes back to me that the boiling point (and freezing point) of water is what the Celsius temp's were based on in the first place. (Regular fire, paper, starts about 451F.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBh895KdXAU 
And you may see me tonight
With an illegal smile
J. Prine
|
|
|
 Re: Radiator coolant, MAYBE.
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,354
Learned Hand
|
Learned Hand
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,354 |
Quote:
Quote:
..., which I believe is about 212 F., unpressurized.
With a pressurized system of 15-20 psi, the boiling point of water is way above the 212.
Not sure I'd call 16 degrees "way above", but it is higher. I guess it would depend "which" 16 degrees, how critical. From The Engineering Toolbox At 15 psi the boiling point is 213 deg F, 228 deg F @ 20 psi.
You need to remember, are you talking absolute (psia or bar a) or gauge pressure (psig or bar g) ?
Generally, when people are talking about pressure, it's gauge pressure (psig). So the 15-20 psi pressure, that would actually be 29.69 to 34.69 psia (add 14.69 to the pressure). So that will give a boiling point (saturation temp) of anywhere from ~250 - 258 deg F). That why pressure cookers cook so fast, you raise the pressure inside, which raises the boiling temperature of the water.
And yes, if you reduce the pressure, you can make water boil at a lower temperature. It's SOP for a lithium bromide type a/c unit, where you use both steam and water boiling at reduced temps to make cool water. It's a neat process.
Steve
Last edited by Conwy; 06/01/2013 8:04 AM.
Blue/White 2007 TBA, Thruxton needles, Unifilter, AI removed, Polaris Bellmouth, Bubs, Nology Coils/wires, Lightbar, Ricor Intiminators, Hagon Nitros, Tall Sissy Bar w/luggage rack, Dart flyscreen & Lowers. 130 Mains, TrueGel Battery MG12-BS.
|
|
|
 Re: Radiator coolant, MAYBE.
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937
Loquacious
|
OP
Loquacious
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937 |
Quote:
...So the 15-20 psi pressure, that would actually be 29.69 to 34.69 psia (add 14.69 to the pressure). So that will give a boiling point (saturation temp) of anywhere from ~250 - 258 deg F).
But would you add the atmospheric pressure to the pressure of a CLOSED/fluid filled system, with virtually no atmosphere (air) with-in that closed system, such as your automotive cooling system, since it's isolated from the outside atmospheric pressure, and ONLY pressurized by the limit of the radiator cap (or the weakest link).
In other words, your cooling system isn't holding a max. pressure of 30 psi (15 atmos. + 15 by system design), which would make the boil over temp. about 250F, or would it?

And you may see me tonight
With an illegal smile
J. Prine
|
|
|
 Re: Radiator coolant, MAYBE.
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,393 Likes: 1
Second Wind
|
Second Wind
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,393 Likes: 1 |
Ok now we all the informatiin required to caise a tremenous amount of trouble. So lets design a new liquid cooling system for air cooled motors. We could sell it as a chromed shiney doodad for the gold fish, I mean Harley riders.
I have no faith in human perfectability. I think that human exertion will have no appreciable effect upon humanity. Man is now only more active - not more happy - nor more wise, than he was 6000 years ago.
Edgar Allan Poe
|
|
|
 Re: Radiator coolant, MAYBE.
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937
Loquacious
|
OP
Loquacious
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,937 |
Quote:
...the gold fish, I mean Harley riders.

I ride Harleys, and that's STILL FUNNY! 
And you may see me tonight
With an illegal smile
J. Prine
|
|
|
|
|