Okay Chad, here's the thing.

After reading your OP above here, I have to ask...Did you ACTUALLY think this new Conan The Barbarian was gonna be a freakin' CLASSIC???? Dude, even the FIRST ONE with Arnold was BARELY so-so AT BEST!!!

Ya see, you've fallen RIGHT INTO the trap that "Hollyweird" WANTS ya to fall into. You're settling for movies that a freakin' 17 year old KID would pay money to see 'cause it won't tax his little 17 year old BRAIN!!!

And so, HERE'S my suggestion...Start reading the freakin' REVIEWS that CRITICS say about the movies BEFORE you watch 'em! Yeah, I know, I've heard all that old BS by people that "If a critic likes such and such a movie, then it'll be bad!" But ya know WHAT?! That idea is usually HOGWASH that is often said by people who demand little in the way of a thought provoking movie. Yeah, like MOST freakin' 17 year olds...WHO btw are the ones who plunk down their money at the boxoffice, and so "Hollyweird" GIVES 'em what the hell they WANT!!!

And so, is it any wonder why "Hollyweird" often times does THAT?!

(...NOOOOOOO, 'cause as Hal Holbrook as Deep Throat says in ALL the President's Men, "Follow the money!")


Yep! Just like a good Single Malt Scotch, you might call me "an acquired taste" TOO.(among the many OTHER things you may care to call me, of course)