Quote: Good idea, Chad. I think that that's admirable. I'm sure you'll eventually find some stats out there on the internet that'll prove you right!
(...ya know, one can never trust that lousy Wikipedia to give us the "real story"...in fact, I'll betcha those folks at Wiki are all probably members of the city of Los Angeles' Chamber of Commerce, and are just tryin' to make Houston look bad in comparison!!!)
You call into question my integrity sir. I would never do such a thing as to falsify the record. I am going to post my findings as I find them. There are contradiction between reliable sources such as the New York times and CQ media. Anyone can have a wiki page I have found fault with them before, so I'll not count them.
I do not make the claim that it can't happen here just that it is less likely.
Nope Chad. I wasn't questioning your personal integrity here.("personal" being the operative word)
Nope, BUT you DO know that it is just "human nature" for almost ANYONE to seek out some tidbit of information which might support their contentions, don't ya?! And sometimes even when the source in question might be considered one which even the seeker might think could be questionable or might be slanted in a manner to "prove" the seeker's contentions.
(...pssst...in fact, I'll let you in on a little secret here if you promise not to tell anybody else...I've even done this myself a few times in my life...but, like I said, please keep this under your hat, okay?!)
Yep! Just like a good Single Malt Scotch, you might call me "an acquired taste" TOO.(among the many OTHER things you may care to call me, of course)
