Quote: The manner in which Phil came to meet his maker is the problem, not weather he wore a helmet or not. If he had worn a helmet the result (unfortunately) would have been the same.
Tom
Hmmmmm...interesting, Tom. Now admittedly I MIGHT have missed where in moe's little rant he happens to mention the SPECIFICS of poor Phil's fatal injuries, like say for instance where it might've mentioned that it WASN'T at all any EXTREME HEAD/BRAIN TRAUMA which might've been the basic cause of his fatality?!
(...well, of course, OTHER than that seemingly semi-blind CAGER who pulled the F*** into his path, anyway!)
And so, give me a minute here while I go re-check moe's original post...I'll be right back................
Nope, sorry Tom. The SPECIFICS of poor Phil's fatal injuries were NOT mentioned at all in moe's post. Which leads to the question: How can you possibly say that poor Phil's fate, i.e., his death(I presume you mean) "would have been the same"?
(...maybe yes, and maybe no I'd say...especially without any further information supplied to us...right?!)
Yep! Just like a good Single Malt Scotch, you might call me "an acquired taste" TOO.(among the many OTHER things you may care to call me, of course)
