Thanks for that Keith.

Interesting words, particularly these ones:

Quote:

If your butt anatomically fits a Corbin, great. If not, it won't work.




The reason is, three or so years ago we were still talking about corbins much the same we are now believe it or not, but one thing that struck me was, everyone then was assuming one seat should have suited everyone and if it didn't there must have been something wrong with the seat.

Well, getting back to the "anatomically fits" words of wisdom from the upholsterer and it made me think, what was he refering to? For instance, what type of backside does fit a corbin and if there is one's that do and one's that don't, shouldn't potential customers know which category they may fit into.

Now, back to the posts I wrote a while back and whilst I was being as respectful as I could given the circumstances, I did ask the question whether perhaps those with bigger butts didn't find them as comfortable as those with ones not as big, so to speak.

You see, I find my corbin brilliant but it did take a while to be that way and I'm in the good weight for age category. Well if I have found it a good saddle, my question was did those who had bigger backsides find them less comfortable and rather than put it down to "anatomically fit", were some just saying they didn't find them comfortable without anyone knowing why.

Anyway, the question was asked and we didn't get very far as I half expected but (or should that be butt ), I did believe I had a point which may have helped others consider if the Corbin might have been good value considering it's almost impossible to "try before you buy" one of these, and without good info how would you know if you were going to waste some half descent money on depreciation.

It's just a point

stacka

Last edited by Staffo; 06/18/2010 10:13 AM.
Staintune Pipes, K&N Pods, 45 pilots, TBS needles and 145 mains.