You make a valid point there, Ron. However, I'm thinkin' here that your following question here does have a variable of which you may not have considered....
Quote:
Is a military son more valuable than a civilian son? If it is that valuable a program it should NOT be just military should it? The larger, better equipped organization should be used so all benefit.
IMHO
Could possibly the idea that YES, a military son(or daughter, for that matter) IS more "valuable" to our government(the entity responsible for this particular focus group) than are their civilian counterparts, because of the all the time and money invested into the former's training and wellbeing?
(just a thought)
