Do some browsing on this specific case ...you will see that gun owners and gun organizations are predominantly backing the Pharmacist.

Most pro-gun, NRA and self defense folks always back the individual who ends up in a case like this.

I am not an expert in the use of firearms but I do strongly support those who happen to need to use theirs.

We call it the right to keep and bear arms and USE those arms when our property , lives and or businesses are endangered by criminals ....

You are aware that these people who entered the pharmacy were nothing but lowlife common criminals on the road to prison or death.?

I am not sorry the numbnuts lost his life. He entered a place of business with premeditated desire to threaten, kill, and steal. He is now dead. Good riddance.

Your assumption that the pharmacist put others in danger is preposterous.

His only small error was ....he used a .380.....a 44 mag would have taken the perps head "clean off" ala Clint Eastwood.


The dead robber's mother refers to him as her baby. he stopped being her baby and got dead when he entered the pharmacy as part of an armed robbery attempt.

My heroic pharmacist protected the lives and property he was in.


"Proud to be an Infidel" ... "100% pure American Jingoist"