I hope "very compact" doesn't mean too small to get the job done.
Matt,
Just to clarify ... as per my previous post he said the bike was slightly larger than ours and "very compact" relative to the size of the engine i.e. for the size of engine he had expected the bike to be much larger.
I think the Cycle World article is incorrect at 295 kgs ... that's 25 short of the Rocket. It can't be that close. Doesn't make sense as this bike is 1 cylinder and 1 shaft drive less. My guess would be circa 260 kgs, give or take 10.
Bedouin.
Blessed are those eyes that have seen more roads than any man! (Homer).
