First off, here's the pics I took the other day which you may find interesting:
So as can be seen with these photos, I found the lip's best posi for me was about 2" or so above my screen. I did experiment with it slightly lower but it wasn't as effective positioned there.
I must admit Steve, I was surprised you found it even more turbulant than without it. Mind you, it did take a few goes for me to find an optimum position.
I also have never heard anyone say they
Quote: still saw double
after having purchased a clearview screen. In fact most of the comments I've read from people have been really positive.
BTW, I forgot to mention that a mate of mine has a new BMW 1200GS and the Touratech screen on it also has the laminar design. It was interesting too as on their website they say the laminar flow effect reduced buffeting,
So by itself I think their using these type of screens says heaps about how effective they (bmw) believe the design is and in my experience, I'd have to agree.
Getting back to you're mentioning
Quote: It would be interesting to hear what you have to say after you add lowers to your setup
,
Well I do agree they would more than likely make even more of a difference as it seems their is a fair bit of air flow coming up from below, and if I could get rid of that It'd be sweet as.
I just don't want to have a wall of perspex or whatever it is they are made of so I'll have to have a think about that one.
So there you go folks. That's the laminar lip both good and bad
