I think the assertion is flawed. IMHO I have never seen a case of a fatal accident where the, at fault, driver was given a reduced penalty because they hit a bike.

Unless you are saying bikers are more valuable than cagers for some reason.

It leaves me thinking, hmmm, I would pull out and kill that biker but now they do jail time so I think I won't change lanes. The penalty in this type of accident has no bearing on correction of behavior. Unless penalties correct or limit behavior they are just penalties.

Nobody intentionally does that type of bonehead move. They regret it forever once the tragedy happens. I am not sure what you would like to accomplish. Revenge maybe. Have you ever met anybody who accidentally killed another? They pay for it, believe me.

Bill has a good idea if the crime was drinking, racing, drugs etc. If it applied to all fatal accidents, not just bikers. What do you do with a biker that kills somebody? I guess they are less at fault because we like bikers.

I try to aggravate one person a day. Today may be your day.