Its not right in a moral sense but probably right contractually, but the government probably would not have paid for experimental either. You would see no difference. I don't live in Canada or England but I do think they have exclusions and parameters. If not, my cousin is a psychic healer that charges 800 per hour, I am going to him 3x per week.
I think they may deny that one. If not! I want this plan! There are always questions. HIV cures can't be released now because the FDA won't approve them. After all we don't want side effects from that stuff. You will just have to die rather than maybe have a liver problem from the drug. A quick look at our FDA is a good snapshot of NHS.
The area of "its a command" is totally out of context. No government was ever commanded to do anything in those years. As a matter of fact "Render onto Cesar what is Cesar's. Render onto" you remember. Individuals were commanded. If I am wrong then once implemented can I consider it my tithing for the year?
As far as the guy from the windy city is concerned, I used to vote with the right all the time. Now I allow myself to have thoughts of my own. I am a slow learner but in 4 years even I figure stuff out.
That is why the right spends all day, every day bashing that one. He scares them to death. One of theirs gets his jail term for obstruction of justice commuted while two border agents sit in jail for shooting a drug dealer. They must be so proud. And this crew or somebody like them would be in charge of a trillion buck program. Nooo, nobody would ever get rich on that little deal would they.
