Check out the new Gallery
wicked red 1100
wicked red 1100
by mag10, August 21
Windshield I need to replace
Windshield I need to replace
by philwarner, May 10
first ride
first ride
by NemoJr, April 1
Steve McQueen inspired
Steve McQueen inspired
by Feral, November 28
GaRally22
GaRally22
by chy, September 18
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Harleys!
leonard #227385 01/16/2008 12:48 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,179
Likes: 55
Fe Butt
Online Content
Fe Butt
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,179
Likes: 55
I thought belts were for weapons.


I learned all I need to know about life by killing smart people and eating their brains.
Eat right ,Exercise ,Stay fit, Die Anyway!
Re: Harleys!
The_Dog33 #227386 01/16/2008 12:52 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 594
Adjunct
Offline
Adjunct
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 594
Quote:

I thought belts were for weapons.


All the good weapons, yes


SFC, US Army (Ret)
Re: Harleys!
The_Dog33 #227387 01/18/2008 5:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 174
Adjunct
Offline
Adjunct
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 174
Chains make for better weapons. Belts are old school.

Larry

Re: Harleys!
oilleak #227388 01/18/2008 10:51 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,060
Likes: 6
Worn Saddle
Offline
Worn Saddle
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,060
Likes: 6
I dunno, I would hate to get whacked with a shaft drive!


Fidelis et Fortis
Re: Harleys!
arstaren #227389 01/19/2008 12:50 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,179
Likes: 55
Fe Butt
Online Content
Fe Butt
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,179
Likes: 55
We were speaking of belt fed weapons.


I learned all I need to know about life by killing smart people and eating their brains.
Eat right ,Exercise ,Stay fit, Die Anyway!
Belts vs chains
The_Dog33 #227390 01/19/2008 12:56 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 594
Adjunct
Offline
Adjunct
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 594
Then again - maybe chain-driven IS better...


SFC, US Army (Ret)
Re: Belts v. Chains
The_Dog33 #227391 01/19/2008 1:26 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 5
Learned Hand
Offline
Learned Hand
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 5
Chains are better on ice. Belts are best on pants. Shafts, well, shafts ... Draw your own conclusions. All I really know is I would have little use for my stock pile of spray wax with the later two.

Last edited by pipedr; 01/19/2008 1:36 AM.

2004 Triumph Speedmaster (J Lo) 2006 Yamaha Stratoliner (Adele)
Re: Belts vs chains
SFCRex #227392 01/19/2008 1:31 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,179
Likes: 55
Fe Butt
Online Content
Fe Butt
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,179
Likes: 55
Quote:

Then again - maybe chain-driven IS better...





Man the cool toys, I'm jealous.


I learned all I need to know about life by killing smart people and eating their brains.
Eat right ,Exercise ,Stay fit, Die Anyway!
Re: Belts v. Chains
pipedr #227393 01/22/2008 9:52 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639
Likes: 3
Old Hand
Offline
Old Hand
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639
Likes: 3
So, if I don't like a belt and my chain breaks, can I use suspenders (bracers) on my Triumph?


Let's hope there's intelligent life somewhere in space 'cause it's buggar all down here. -- Monte Python
Re: Belts v. Chains
Greybeard #227394 01/22/2008 10:11 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,968
Likes: 1
Loquacious
Offline
Loquacious
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,968
Likes: 1
Quote:

So, if I don't like a belt and my chain breaks, can I use suspenders (bracers) on my Triumph?




Experts say yes!!


Live Free or Die Velvet
Re: Belts v. Chains
Fishercat #227395 03/09/2008 10:27 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 37
Greenhorn
Offline
Greenhorn
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 37
good techhere (newbie) to some one finger person but is your bike put on it what you want,I like chains(no wips) as long as the bike ride is safe and fun.

Re: Belts v. Chains
goodtech #227396 03/09/2008 10:40 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 15
Loquacious
Offline
Loquacious
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 15
I asked my dealer about a belt conversion for my new 07 SM & he advised against it because (1) extra stress on the rear wheel bearings due to the required belt tension & (2) extra drag, effectively sapping some RWHP. That makes sense to me. The dealer told me that one customer returned to chain from belt for those reasons. All things considered, I'll stick with the chain. That said, the belt conversion looks great to my eyes.

Re: Belts v. Chains
B02S4 #227397 03/10/2008 9:05 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639
Likes: 3
Old Hand
Offline
Old Hand
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639
Likes: 3
He's right. There is more friction as well as more tension. Sometime, try bending a belt. They are a lot stiffer than a chain and it takes engine power to constantly bend a belt around the "sprockets".


Let's hope there's intelligent life somewhere in space 'cause it's buggar all down here. -- Monte Python
Re: Belts v. Chains
Greybeard #227398 03/10/2008 9:40 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,825
"Lighten up, Francis."
Offline
"Lighten up, Francis."
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,825
I don't know about the extra wheel bearing stress. So far so good after about 25k miles with the belt. As far as the friction goes, I'm sure that's true, but it is absolutely not noticeable to me. In fact, it seems like the take-off response is better. I don't know if that's just the lack of chain slack or lack of chain noise. But it feels better in the seat of the pants.

Mostly, I just hated lubing my chain and scraping the gunk off my rear wheel, swingarm, etc.


BA.com Caretaker | Friarsride | jb.com
Re: Belts v. Chains
FriarJohn #227399 03/10/2008 11:51 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 195
Adjunct
Offline
Adjunct
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 195
I would say it is a draw. The belts look better and keep a cleaner motorcycle. I doubt they exibit any move friction because they seem stiffer than chains which do not run on metal teeth with grease to reduce the high friction. If the bearings are not underrated, I doubt they would wear out. After all they are carrying at least 200 lbs of manly muscle from above. The real issue is to make sure your belt is tight and replace it as recommended. All of the HDs cannot be wrong.

Re: Belts v. Chains
Rob_Mayes #227400 03/10/2008 12:28 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,179
Likes: 55
Fe Butt
Online Content
Fe Butt
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,179
Likes: 55
Well as far as HD goes, those open belt primaries do shorten bottom end life and tranny bearing life. On our bikes I would tend to think it wouldn't do much to the rear wheel since those bearings are designed to take that sort of stress but the output shaft bearings in the tranny are another story. Might not notice it right away but I bet in the long run the belt will shorten their life span.


I learned all I need to know about life by killing smart people and eating their brains.
Eat right ,Exercise ,Stay fit, Die Anyway!
Re: Belts v. Chains
Rob_Mayes #227401 03/10/2008 3:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,825
"Lighten up, Francis."
Offline
"Lighten up, Francis."
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,825
Quote:

After all they are carrying at least 200 lbs of manly muscle from above.




I would kill to weigh only 200 lbs. I wouldn't, apparently, diet and exercise to weigh that little.

Quote:

All of the HDs cannot be wrong.




Oh ZOD, don't even go there.


BA.com Caretaker | Friarsride | jb.com
Re: Belts v. Chains
Greybeard #227402 03/10/2008 9:11 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,457
Learned Hand
Offline
Learned Hand
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,457
Quote:

...Sometime, try bending a belt. They are a lot stiffer than a chain...




Also, the retro-fit kit for our bikes (QPD) has smaller sprockets than you'd normally find on a factory setup. Seems to me that would put more stress on the belt. May be operating closer to its design limit.

Re: Harleys!
Pawdiddle #227403 03/10/2008 9:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 347
Adjunct
Offline
Adjunct
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 347
One thing though, don't forget some of the older bikes that when you broke a chain "it sometimes went through the engine block".

jerry


2005 America, Green, Thunderbike exhaust LEAD, FOLLOW, OR GET THE HE** OUT OF THE WAY!
Re: Harleys!
jerry #227404 03/11/2008 11:42 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639
Likes: 3
Old Hand
Offline
Old Hand
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639
Likes: 3
Quote:

One thing though, don't forget some of the older bikes that when you broke a chain "it sometimes went through the engine block".

jerry




Never had that happen. In 54 years of riding, only had 2 chains break and they both just spilled out on the ground. I've known guys who have had a chain wrap around the rear hub, but I think they had the adjustment too loose or maybe had a really bad stretched spot and the chain came off the sprocket first, then broke.
When belts were first making a come-back, (they were very popular around 1910 and before) a friend picked up a rock on his new belt. It rode the belt through the sprocket, popped a hole in the belt and, in the process, shot out the headlight of the guy riding behind him.


Let's hope there's intelligent life somewhere in space 'cause it's buggar all down here. -- Monte Python
Re: Belts v. Chains
goodtech #227405 03/15/2008 12:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 347
Adjunct
Offline
Adjunct
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 347
If I remember correctly, the early honda 750's had a corner of the engine block in front of the front sprocket & some of those brocken chains went thru the block.

jerry


2005 America, Green, Thunderbike exhaust LEAD, FOLLOW, OR GET THE HE** OUT OF THE WAY!
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  bennybmn, chy, mert 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4