 An interesting safety study
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639 Likes: 3
Old Hand
|
OP
Old Hand
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639 Likes: 3 |
This is a study on cell phone use and traffic accidents resulting in hospital visits. Copy and past the entire address.
http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/rapidpdf/...;resourcetype=1,2,3,4
Last edited by Greybeard; 08/19/2005 7:01 PM.
Let's hope there's intelligent life somewhere in space 'cause it's buggar all down here. -- Monte Python
|
|
|
 Re: An interesting safety study
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,590
Check Pants
|
Check Pants
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,590 |
I have pretty much much operated under the assumption that the only behavior I can change is my own. Largely as a result of the observations posted on this board, I nearly always pull over when using the antiquated bag phone in my pickup. Be it side of the road, a parking lot, whatever works. Now I notice how few people take the time to get out of traffic.
I have to drive around so much for work, I consider it a "risk mgmt" precaution.
"It's not what I say that's important, it's what you hear" Red Auerbach
|
|
|
 Re: An interesting safety study
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,164 Likes: 1
Should be Riding
|
Should be Riding
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,164 Likes: 1 |
I am not going to dispute that using a non-hands-free phone while driving can be a little bit more dangerous and distracting. But the claim "Driver's use of a mobile phone up to 10 minutes before a crash was associated with a fourfold increased likelihood of crashing" and "Using a hands-free phone is not any safer." is ridiculous, especially since they only studied people that were in accidents. What about all the people that were not in accidents? Of course that would mean they would have to study every person on the planet to get real numbers and statistics; those that use phones while driving and did get into accidents vs. those use phones while driving and didn’t get into accidents; those that do not talk on the phone while driving and got into accidents vs. those that do not talk on the phone and do not get onto accidents.
Their report makes it sound like cell phones are the ultimate evil and the only cause for accidents. What about other causes of accidents, like the ones that it was the other guys fault? I also did not notice anything about the driving records of the participants. Some people are more accident prone than others.
Following the logic of studies like this, that cell phones are extremely dangerous and that even after getting off the phone 10 minutes (a long time) earlier, you will get into an accident (they only said using a cell phone upto 10 minutes earlier, nothing about if that was while in the car or not), they may as well say that doing anything besides driving while you are driving is hazardous. While driving, you should drive alone, if you can’t drive alone do not talk to any passengers in the car. Do not use the radio, if you use the radio, do not listen to it (I remember a similar study about radios in cars when I was a kid).
I view reports like these bogus paranoia propaganda crap. I am not saying that using a phone while driving can't distract you a little bit, but that just means you have to be more cautious when using the phone, making driving and focusing on the road and traffic primary and passengers, phones, radios, etc secondary.
At least they excluded motorcyclists. So, we are safe no matter what.
Soren
|
|
|
 Re: An interesting safety study
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639 Likes: 3
Old Hand
|
OP
Old Hand
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639 Likes: 3 |
Ever see some idiot driving along with a hands off phone blabbing, making faces and flapping both their hands around? Or some hothead screaming and yelling and wishing they could get their hands on the throat of the person they are talking to? Not much safer than a handheld, maybe not as safe. I suspect there are unsafe psychological effects of phoning on the road that go well beyond the immediate distraction of operating a phone.
Let's hope there's intelligent life somewhere in space 'cause it's buggar all down here. -- Monte Python
|
|
|
 Re: An interesting safety study
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,164 Likes: 1
Should be Riding
|
Should be Riding
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,164 Likes: 1 |
Quote:
Ever see some idiot driving along with a hands off phone blabbing, making faces and flapping both their hands around? Or some hothead screaming and yelling and wishing they could get their hands on the throat of the person they are talking to?
That kind of proves my point. Those are the idiots. Those are the ones that do not place their attention to driving first. In my opinion those same types of people that act like that with other people and not just on the phone. It's one of those personal responsibility things. To generalize and say that everyone is four times as likely to get into an accident during or after talking on the phone is crazy. It should be that those who are on the phone or have been on the phone and do not pay attention or do not care about what the heck they are doing are four times as likely to get into an accident.
In the interest of public safety (protecting us from ourselves), I propose a study of how more likely are you to get into an accident of you are living and breathing. Soren
|
|
|
 Re: An interesting safety study
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,537
Check Pants
|
Check Pants
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,537 |
MD has a law that goes into effect Oct 1st that prohibits anyone under 18 yrs old from talking on a cell phone will driving. It's a start.
Al
|
|
|
 Re: An interesting safety study
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639 Likes: 3
Old Hand
|
OP
Old Hand
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639 Likes: 3 |
Unfortunately, there are more idiots every day. I think it was Mark Twain who once said, "The amount of intellegence alloted to mankind is fixed, but the population keeeps increasing". I am beginning to believe that.
Let's hope there's intelligent life somewhere in space 'cause it's buggar all down here. -- Monte Python
|
|
|
|
|