Great read, John. Ain't it always nice gettin' in the last laugh!
BUT, there's one very small minor little nitpick I have in your text here: You twice mention this certain individual of the female variety whom you classified as a "lady".
Need I say it?(oh, but I WILL, of course....)
THAT individual was NO lady, Sir.
Cheers,
Dwight
(I mean, COME ON John...I KNOW your vocabulary is wider than THAT...USE IT, dear boy, USE IT...because I KNOW you could have found a more descriptive noun for her that STILL wouldn't have crossed the line into bad taste...there's a veritable PLETHORA of words in this language you could have used here, YOU KNOW???!!!)
