 Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 26
Greenhorn
|
Greenhorn
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 26 |
Quote:
The HD site says this is a chain drive bike... looks belt drive in the picture.
The primary drive chain is between the main engine and the gearbox. The secondary drive would be belt.
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
1200 nightster, not bad!
|
khatt
|
02/20/2007 12:41 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
dmillikan
|
02/20/2007 1:00 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Fishercat
|
02/20/2007 2:17 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
FriarJohn
|
02/20/2007 2:25 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
JAEGER
|
02/20/2007 9:34 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
roundy77
|
02/20/2007 9:38 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Dill
|
02/20/2007 10:41 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
LitzerSki
|
02/21/2007 5:11 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
mikemm03
|
02/21/2007 3:12 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Fillo
|
02/22/2007 6:49 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
khatt
|
02/24/2007 1:15 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
victorjr
|
03/01/2007 2:13 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/02/2007 7:14 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
77T140V
|
03/04/2007 3:06 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Greybeard
|
03/04/2007 2:42 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
ssjones
|
02/21/2007 2:46 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
FriarJohn
|
02/21/2007 3:05 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
bennybmn
|
02/21/2007 10:12 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
oneijack
|
02/21/2007 10:58 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
PES
|
03/04/2007 6:01 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/04/2007 7:17 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
victorjr
|
03/06/2007 3:25 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/06/2007 10:32 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
victorjr
|
03/06/2007 10:12 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
SKILLET
|
03/07/2007 6:20 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/07/2007 2:13 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
bennybmn
|
03/07/2007 10:57 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Bobbed
|
03/11/2007 1:57 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
khatt
|
03/20/2007 3:52 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
The_Dog33
|
03/22/2007 10:27 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/23/2007 12:15 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
oneijack
|
03/23/2007 1:01 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/23/2007 1:08 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
The_Dog33
|
03/30/2007 2:46 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
ATriumphGoddess
|
03/31/2007 1:07 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
oneijack
|
03/31/2007 1:36 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
The_Dog33
|
03/31/2007 2:30 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Dill
|
03/31/2007 3:14 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
The_Dog33
|
04/01/2007 5:08 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Cowtipper
|
04/01/2007 7:49 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/04/2007 7:50 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
dmillikan
|
04/07/2007 11:02 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/07/2007 4:13 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kennymc
|
04/07/2007 7:42 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
ssjones
|
04/08/2007 1:27 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Tommy
|
04/09/2007 2:46 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/09/2007 1:01 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
pratt
|
04/09/2007 3:54 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/10/2007 12:30 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/04/2007 2:08 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
WI_RN
|
03/07/2007 10:32 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
newt
|
03/07/2007 10:54 PM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
victorjr
|
03/08/2007 5:49 AM
|
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
JCBullen
|
03/12/2007 7:31 PM
|
|
|
|
