 Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,219 Likes: 61
Fe Butt
|
Fe Butt
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,219 Likes: 61 |
Look that iron head over VERY closely if you are interested. They had problems with the cam design. All 4 cams ride between the right innercase and outer cover. Very poor design. Look the tranny over very well too those were over complicated and prone to problems as well. Not to mention you need to carry a candle for when the generator isn't working (most of the time LOL)
I learned all I need to know about life by killing smart people and eating their brains. Eat right ,Exercise ,Stay fit, Die Anyway!
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
1200 nightster, not bad!
|
khatt
|
02/20/2007 12:41 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
dmillikan
|
02/20/2007 1:00 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Fishercat
|
02/20/2007 2:17 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
FriarJohn
|
02/20/2007 2:25 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
JAEGER
|
02/20/2007 9:34 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
roundy77
|
02/20/2007 9:38 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Dill
|
02/20/2007 10:41 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
LitzerSki
|
02/21/2007 5:11 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
mikemm03
|
02/21/2007 3:12 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Fillo
|
02/22/2007 6:49 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
khatt
|
02/24/2007 1:15 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
victorjr
|
03/01/2007 2:13 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/02/2007 7:14 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
77T140V
|
03/04/2007 3:06 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Greybeard
|
03/04/2007 2:42 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
ssjones
|
02/21/2007 2:46 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
FriarJohn
|
02/21/2007 3:05 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
bennybmn
|
02/21/2007 10:12 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
oneijack
|
02/21/2007 10:58 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
PES
|
03/04/2007 6:01 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/04/2007 7:17 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
victorjr
|
03/06/2007 3:25 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/06/2007 10:32 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
victorjr
|
03/06/2007 10:12 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
SKILLET
|
03/07/2007 6:20 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/07/2007 2:13 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
bennybmn
|
03/07/2007 10:57 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Bobbed
|
03/11/2007 1:57 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
khatt
|
03/20/2007 3:52 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
The_Dog33
|
03/22/2007 10:27 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/23/2007 12:15 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
oneijack
|
03/23/2007 1:01 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/23/2007 1:08 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
The_Dog33
|
03/30/2007 2:46 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
ATriumphGoddess
|
03/31/2007 1:07 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
oneijack
|
03/31/2007 1:36 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
The_Dog33
|
03/31/2007 2:30 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Dill
|
03/31/2007 3:14 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
The_Dog33
|
04/01/2007 5:08 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Cowtipper
|
04/01/2007 7:49 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/04/2007 7:50 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
dmillikan
|
04/07/2007 11:02 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/07/2007 4:13 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kennymc
|
04/07/2007 7:42 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
ssjones
|
04/08/2007 1:27 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Tommy
|
04/09/2007 2:46 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/09/2007 1:01 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
pratt
|
04/09/2007 3:54 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/10/2007 12:30 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/04/2007 2:08 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
WI_RN
|
03/07/2007 10:32 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
newt
|
03/07/2007 10:54 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
victorjr
|
03/08/2007 5:49 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
JCBullen
|
03/12/2007 7:31 PM
|
|
|
|