 Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 26
Greenhorn
|
Greenhorn
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 26 |
The nightster I have after doing a little work now has 74 hp and 73 ft lbs of torque. The exhaust pipe change lowered the bikes weight 30 lbs. Now it's only 10 lbs heavier than my speedmaster and 300+ cc's bigger. I had done quite a bit of work on the speedmaster, epco pipes, rejet, uni air filter, snorkle and AI removal. I have not had the speedy on the dyno but I am guessing it would not hit 60 HP or 60 ft lbs of torque. I still really like my speedy but this nightster will blow my speedy away in a race in either a standing start or rolling start.
So if you want to say the nightster is a girls bike then that's cool because I know what it can do. So I am guessing you must ride a rocket because the 900's must be girls bikes too if a 1200 sportster is.
[image]http://www.bonnevilleamerica.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=6404&sort=1&cat=500&page=1[/image]
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
1200 nightster, not bad!
|
khatt
|
02/20/2007 12:41 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
dmillikan
|
02/20/2007 1:00 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Fishercat
|
02/20/2007 2:17 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
FriarJohn
|
02/20/2007 2:25 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
JAEGER
|
02/20/2007 9:34 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
roundy77
|
02/20/2007 9:38 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Dill
|
02/20/2007 10:41 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
LitzerSki
|
02/21/2007 5:11 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
mikemm03
|
02/21/2007 3:12 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Fillo
|
02/22/2007 6:49 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
khatt
|
02/24/2007 1:15 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
victorjr
|
03/01/2007 2:13 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/02/2007 7:14 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
77T140V
|
03/04/2007 3:06 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Greybeard
|
03/04/2007 2:42 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
ssjones
|
02/21/2007 2:46 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
FriarJohn
|
02/21/2007 3:05 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
bennybmn
|
02/21/2007 10:12 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
oneijack
|
02/21/2007 10:58 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
PES
|
03/04/2007 6:01 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/04/2007 7:17 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
victorjr
|
03/06/2007 3:25 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/06/2007 10:32 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
victorjr
|
03/06/2007 10:12 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
SKILLET
|
03/07/2007 6:20 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/07/2007 2:13 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
bennybmn
|
03/07/2007 10:57 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Bobbed
|
03/11/2007 1:57 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
khatt
|
03/20/2007 3:52 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
The_Dog33
|
03/22/2007 10:27 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/23/2007 12:15 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
oneijack
|
03/23/2007 1:01 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/23/2007 1:08 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
The_Dog33
|
03/30/2007 2:46 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
ATriumphGoddess
|
03/31/2007 1:07 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
oneijack
|
03/31/2007 1:36 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
The_Dog33
|
03/31/2007 2:30 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Dill
|
03/31/2007 3:14 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
The_Dog33
|
04/01/2007 5:08 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Cowtipper
|
04/01/2007 7:49 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/04/2007 7:50 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
dmillikan
|
04/07/2007 11:02 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/07/2007 4:13 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kennymc
|
04/07/2007 7:42 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
ssjones
|
04/08/2007 1:27 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Tommy
|
04/09/2007 2:46 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/09/2007 1:01 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
pratt
|
04/09/2007 3:54 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/10/2007 12:30 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/04/2007 2:08 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
WI_RN
|
03/07/2007 10:32 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
newt
|
03/07/2007 10:54 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
victorjr
|
03/08/2007 5:49 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
JCBullen
|
03/12/2007 7:31 PM
|
|
|
|