 Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,839 Likes: 3
Loquacious
|
Loquacious
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,839 Likes: 3 |
lets see who gets 50,000 mi on theirs without any engine work, the hardley davidson or the Triumph, then we will talk hahahahaha oh wait, there are already some Triumphs on here that have 50 plus k with no engine work. never mind!!!! hahahahahahaha i have a Triumph with 120,000mi that has never had engine work below the heads and when i told that to a h.d. dealer the other day when he ask me why i didnt buy h.d and i told him to show me a h.d. that he could say that about and i would buy it that night, he said to me "well you know that aint gonna happen" all i could say was, thats why i ride Triumph hahahahahahaha 
ENJOY!!!!! NEWT!!!!!
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
1200 nightster, not bad!
|
khatt
|
02/20/2007 12:41 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
dmillikan
|
02/20/2007 1:00 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Fishercat
|
02/20/2007 2:17 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
FriarJohn
|
02/20/2007 2:25 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
JAEGER
|
02/20/2007 9:34 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
roundy77
|
02/20/2007 9:38 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Dill
|
02/20/2007 10:41 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
LitzerSki
|
02/21/2007 5:11 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
mikemm03
|
02/21/2007 3:12 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Fillo
|
02/22/2007 6:49 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
khatt
|
02/24/2007 1:15 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
victorjr
|
03/01/2007 2:13 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/02/2007 7:14 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
77T140V
|
03/04/2007 3:06 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Greybeard
|
03/04/2007 2:42 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
ssjones
|
02/21/2007 2:46 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
FriarJohn
|
02/21/2007 3:05 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
bennybmn
|
02/21/2007 10:12 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
oneijack
|
02/21/2007 10:58 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
PES
|
03/04/2007 6:01 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/04/2007 7:17 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
victorjr
|
03/06/2007 3:25 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/06/2007 10:32 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
victorjr
|
03/06/2007 10:12 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
SKILLET
|
03/07/2007 6:20 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/07/2007 2:13 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
bennybmn
|
03/07/2007 10:57 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Bobbed
|
03/11/2007 1:57 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
khatt
|
03/20/2007 3:52 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
The_Dog33
|
03/22/2007 10:27 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/23/2007 12:15 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
oneijack
|
03/23/2007 1:01 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
03/23/2007 1:08 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
The_Dog33
|
03/30/2007 2:46 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
ATriumphGoddess
|
03/31/2007 1:07 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
oneijack
|
03/31/2007 1:36 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
The_Dog33
|
03/31/2007 2:30 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Dill
|
03/31/2007 3:14 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
The_Dog33
|
04/01/2007 5:08 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Cowtipper
|
04/01/2007 7:49 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/04/2007 7:50 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
dmillikan
|
04/07/2007 11:02 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/07/2007 4:13 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kennymc
|
04/07/2007 7:42 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
ssjones
|
04/08/2007 1:27 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
Tommy
|
04/09/2007 2:46 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/09/2007 1:01 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
pratt
|
04/09/2007 3:54 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/10/2007 12:30 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
kenfm
|
04/04/2007 2:08 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
WI_RN
|
03/07/2007 10:32 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
newt
|
03/07/2007 10:54 PM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
victorjr
|
03/08/2007 5:49 AM
|
Re: 1200 nightster, not bad!
|
JCBullen
|
03/12/2007 7:31 PM
|
|
|
|