 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,734
Loquacious
|
Loquacious
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,734 |
Well I wouldn't call it "worrying about Harley"....it's just some good natured ribbing most of the time. In fact, I hear more derogatory comments about the modern day "Motor Company" from chopper forums than on this forum. A lot of the old guys riding Panheads and Shovelheads, and even EVOs really dislike the modern Harley RUBS/Yuppies and the way H-D caters to their ilk with everything under the sun sold at the dealer from stuffed bears to jars of pickles being sold by a retail staff of females who would look more at home behind the cash register at the mall than on the seat of a Harley.
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 382
Adjunct
|
Adjunct
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 382 |
I think it must be a brit thing too,  I just read the thread about BIR, and they cant even tolerate Triumphs that aint like theirs. 
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 559
Adjunct
|
Adjunct
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 559 |
A lot of the newer Triumph owners seemed way concerned about what the Harley riders think. I think its an inferiority complex, always worry about what the Harley riders think. Whether or not the Harley rider will accept me or say hi to me, or gosh, I hope that Harley rider waves to me. I have never had one problem with anyone who rides Harleys. I am too busy enjoying myself to worry about what another rider thinks. I don't look down at any rider but alot of the Harley worriers do the same to the import cruiser crowd.
I think a lot has to do with the fact that these bikes ( In Harley owners minds) are the equivalent to the Sportster. Most riders hold the Sportster in disdain but when asked they usally had owned one in their past. A lot of members deciding factor to buying their SM/BA was price. You receive a lot for the price but its still on the economical side. A lot of members would love to have a harley but would never pay for one. These I find are the ones that make the biggest stink about Harley's. They somehow have to demean the other brands in order to validate their purchase. Deep inside they want to be accepted by the Harley crowd and get their feelings hurt when someone doesn't wave or doesn't park their harley right next to theirs.
I am in no means defending Harley riders(myself included) but you have to admit Harley has cornered the market on the Toughguy biker image. With this in mind too many of the new weekend warriors feel a sense of entitlement when they lay that $20k down to own one.
Fryguy
Man, you must be fast because you were haulin' A$$ when I passed you back there. . .
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639 Likes: 3
Old Hand
|
Old Hand
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639 Likes: 3 |
Quote:
With this in mind too many of the new weekend warriors feel a sense of entitlement when they lay that $20k down to own one.
Well, they should expect to get *something for all that money. 
Also, for the members of UK and other British speaking origions, the HD vs Brit bike thing in the US is somewhat like the rockers vs mods except that Venice beach substituted for Brighton.
Let's hope there's intelligent life somewhere in space 'cause it's buggar all down here. -- Monte Python
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,179
Learned Hand
|
Learned Hand
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,179 |
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson?
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,531
Loquacious
|
Loquacious
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,531 |
I have to say ditto.... the HD's love my Triumph's (2) and in fact put my mildly modified Bonnie-A at the front of most of the toy runs around here.....usually the patches view most of the 1200 mile a year HD riders and Japan bikes as wannabes, however the local Trumpet riders are viewed as true bikers around here and always visible since we usually do not wear all black.....Personally, the tradition of 100+ years ends up with a friendly rivalry and respect between the two marquees......but what ever you choose to ride is fine,,,as long as you really ride ! AND even if you don't ride alot...bless ya, you help keep the motorcycle industry going..........P.S. The reason for most brand specific clubs was for the inter-change-ability of parts when a brothers bike went down.....worked better if everyone road the same make.
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,485
Learned Hand
|
Learned Hand
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,485 |
I too like HD's just fine. But I LOVE my BA. Better fit, better feel, way better price. And you don't see one on every street corner. All my HD friends give Triumph a big thumbs up. They've been around long enough to know about tradition. I've always like being a bit different than the rest of the crowd. I stiil recall my 7th grade science teacher riding to school on his chopped 650cc Triumph in 1970. Must have made a deeper impression on me than I realized. Thank you, Mr. Keyes, wherever you are!!
Last edited by blackdog; 05/19/2006 8:09 AM.
"Despite all the amputation, you could dance to a rock 'n roll station..."
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 24
Complete Newb
|
Complete Newb
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 24 |
Okay my two cents worth. I own a Harley and I also just bought a Triumph Speedmaster. I like both bikes because they are so different. The Speedie was about half the price of my Harley and is just as much fun to ride, just in a different way. As for the people, I know a lot of people who ride Harley's and do not look down at others who ride different bikes. If I had my choice (and a lot more money) I would buy a couple more bikes that are different from my Harley and Triumph. Maybe a sport bike, the Speed Triple would be a good choice, or something else completely different from what I already have. Why, because it would be fun to ride something totally different. My first bike was a Honda in England about 30 years ago. I now own a Harley because I can now afford one and they are cool bikes to ride. If someone buys a Harley just to be a part of a social crowd, what is wrong with that. Your typical 45 year old male or female is not going to buy a rice rocket and hang out with a bunch of 20 somethings, not because they do not like the 20 somethings, but because they probably don't have a lot in common, and probably don't have the backs to ride an uncomfortable bike for a long period of time. Also they probably have kids at home about the same age and want to get away from them for a while.  Anyway, enjoy riding and socializing with whoever you like and don't worry about who rides what kind of bike. If you see an old guy on a Harley and you think it is a cool looking bike, let him know. You might be surprised when that old guy on the Harley is friendly and tells you what a cool Triumph you have.
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 21
Complete Newb
|
Complete Newb
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 21 |
Maybe some of the other members of this forum are different than me,but I don't really see much of this "attitude" you refer too. There has been rivalry between Triumph and HD for decades but that doesn't mean they don't respect the other riders and their bikes. If you want to see "attitude" talk to a Chevy or Ford fan. When I bought my Dodge Ram, the only thing positive my brother-in-law could say was "Nice tires". I think most America/Speedmaster riders feel a closer kinship with the HD crowd than with anyone else out there. That is definitely true for me, but it sure won't stop me from giving my riding buddies a good natured slam every chance I get.I almost never bad mouth Honda, Yamaha, Suzuki etc. Why bother? I work with a few guys who bought Harleys for the image and I put them in the same class as the guys on their Honda-Davidsons. I also work with a guy that has over 98,000 miles on his Softail. He doesn't have any tattoos or ponytail and he isn't worried about looking or acting like a biker. I have nothing but respect for him. He has a garage full of other bikes too, mostly Japanese dirt bikes. What's my point? I dunno. Maybe we are Harley bashers because under the surface Triumph riders and Harley riders are not really all that different. If we were we would just ignore them.
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 21
Complete Newb
|
Complete Newb
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 21 |
A couple of weeks ago a couple passed me in a car and the woman blew me a kiss as they went by. I haven't decided if it was the Triumph or my manly presence, but I grinned the rest of the way home. 
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,825
"Lighten up, Francis."
|
"Lighten up, Francis."
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,825 |
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,164 Likes: 1
Should be Riding
|
Should be Riding
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,164 Likes: 1 |
Quote:
I don't really see much of this "attitude" you refer too. There has been rivalry between Triumph and HD for decades but that doesn't mean they don't respect the other riders and their bikes.
You are right. Most of the trash talk between Triumph and HD owners is just that trash talk and not serious stuff. It's all in fun.
Soren
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,726
Loquacious
|
Loquacious
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,726 |
I have the only Triumph in a large group of friends that all have HDs. Every where we go HDs account for 98% of the bikes. I've never sensed any true negative attitude toward my bike. I do take a lot of crap, but it's all in fun. HD riders, by far, have more respect for Triumph than any other non-English brand riders.
Bob
2005 America, 904cc - sold. 2014 Trophy SE.
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639 Likes: 3
Old Hand
|
Old Hand
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639 Likes: 3 |
One of my favorite responses: "Well yeah, I don't have as much torque as you do, but I don't need it because I never have to start off on the side of the road except when I stop to help one of you guys."
Let's hope there's intelligent life somewhere in space 'cause it's buggar all down here. -- Monte Python
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 879
3/4 Throttle
|
3/4 Throttle
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 879 |
In my humble opinion I think the Triumph is a 'classy' looking bike. The HD's tend to be a bit 'vulgar'. There are a lot of HD 'clones' out there and I don't think a BA/Speedy can be accused of being one of them.
I like the Street Rod though.
but each to his own......
If you do it today you MIGHT regret it. If you CAN'T do it tomorrow you WILL regret it.
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,971
Loquacious
|
Loquacious
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,971 |
You have to give Harley credit for selling so many engines with that p*** poor / ancient engine design.
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,382
Learned Hand
|
Learned Hand
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,382 |
I was at the East Coast Sturgis event today. My son and I stopped at a gas station near the event where there were at least two to three hundred bikes...99.9% of them were HD's. While sitting there checking out the scene I had numerous folks come over and comment on my America. All in all I would say there were really nice guys (and gals). One guy even took a picture with his phone camera... said, "damn, I just can't get over how different that bike is... it looks like a custom".
'06 TBA - Black, AI and Snorkel removed, K&N Drop In, Gutted Stock Pipes, 145/42, 2 turns out.
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 734
Adjunct
|
Adjunct
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 734 |
Quote:
Anyway, enjoy riding and socializing with whoever you like and don't worry about who rides what kind of bike. If you see an old guy on a Harley and you think it is a cool looking bike, let him know. You might be surprised when that old guy on the Harley is friendly and tells you what a cool Triumph you have.
Good advise. 
---------------------
- 2007 Triumph Tiger
- 1982 Yamaha xj650 Magnum
- Previous 2004 Triumph America
- Previous 1973 Triumph Bonneville T140V 750cc
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639 Likes: 3
Old Hand
|
Old Hand
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639 Likes: 3 |
Quote:
You have to give Harley credit for selling so many engines with that p*** poor / ancient engine design.
Yup, those terrible antiquey engines are really bad for business, they last way too long. They should be more like the Japanese made clones and fall apart so badly as to resist rebuilding in 5 years.
Let's hope there's intelligent life somewhere in space 'cause it's buggar all down here. -- Monte Python
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 82
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 82 |
Who cares? If you have two wheels, ride on them.
Nuttier than squirel s**t.
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 290
Adjunct
|
Adjunct
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 290 |
I looked at both Harley Davidson and Suzuki when I bought my TBA. I liked the idea of riding a bike that was different than the rest. The parallel twin motor and the mystique that comes with the name Triumph sold me over the rest. (That and the fact that I could get the bike at a considerably lower cost than the Harley!) I haven't regretted my decision. I love the bike and the way it rides. I have had one problem, (the airbox blew up!) but with that aside, I couldn't be happier. Now I'm entering the phase where I am ready to take the bike away from complete stock and start some performance mods. The more time I spend on this forum, the more I learn and the more I want to make some of these fun changes!
Randy:
'05 TBA Green/silver AI out
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson?
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 948
3/4 Throttle
|
3/4 Throttle
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 948 |
Having grown up in the '50's and '60's, I remember well the competition between Triumph and Harley and to a lesser extent Indian.
Redbike7
2006 America
No amount of skill can overcome gross stupidity. Ask me how I know...never mind, I forgot...
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,971
Loquacious
|
Loquacious
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,971 |
The rivalry between Triumph and Harley is indeed ancient, but I'd say much less so these days.
For the life of me, I can't undestand why anyone would want an engine that fires -
tic tic ----- tic tic ----- tic tic ----- tic tic
when for half the price, you can have an engine that fires
tic - tic - tic - tic - tic - tic - tic - tic
The power of media hype and myth has proved extremely lucrative to the Harley Stock holders. I wouldn't own one due to the powerplant engineering antiquities, but I do wish I had bought their stock when it was in the sh**house.
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 146
Adjunct
|
Adjunct
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 146 |
I pull into a Quicky Mart next to a full dress Harley Road King and some 13 yr old kids come out of the store and and start looking at my bike, ignoring the Harley. One kid says "hay mister, how much did you pay for that bike?" I say's 8 grand. The kid turns to the Harley guy and asks the same question. No answer - so I say probably 30 or 40 thousand dollars sitting there. The guy says, "no, all told with the custom paint it's $50,000. Dead silence. As I start my bike to pull away I look at the guys face and I think he was starting to face the reality thay he had been screwed.
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 948
3/4 Throttle
|
3/4 Throttle
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 948 |
Not only are both Triumphs and Harleys good bikes, both are amazing companies to have come back from the dead like they have-especially with the Japanese domination of the industry. Indian has proven how hard it is to bring a brand back onto the market. Maybe this time they will make it.
Even though HD never officially died, before they were bought out by management from AMF(the bowling ball people) they weren't very high quality machines.
And the old Triumphs weren't exactly trouble or drip free either. Both of these companies have come light years. Congratulations to them both and long may they prosper.
I picked up a book at Half-Price books called the Illustrated Directory of Motorcycles. It's like walking through a grave yard and reading tombstones. BSA, Matchless, Ariel, AJS, Velocette and those are just some English bikes I remember from the '50'and '60's that are no longer around.
Redbike7
2006 America
No amount of skill can overcome gross stupidity. Ask me how I know...never mind, I forgot...
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 322
Adjunct
|
Adjunct
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 322 |
Well, I have both a Harley Softail and a Triumph SM... plan on keeping both of them, my Ymaaha and Suzuki, I'll just ride till they wear out and then trash...
Two things about both marks.. you can keep rebuilding the when they wear out..try that with a Jap bike...except for a few models, you cant' get parts... although the Harley design is antiquated, you can get/make parts...and isnt' that true of Triumph also? And you can sure believe that the real Harley bikers and riders cut down the RUB and trailer queens just as badly as anyone else...if not worse... Talked to one guy that rode to Sturgis... he picke up his 07 Harley at 4pm one day and took off for Sturgis the next morning... from Los Angeles, then was going to Pennsylvania to see his folks and then back to LA... Said he saw a minivan pull up and park at the curb on a side street in Sturgis... out climbs 6 peeps, all dressed to the t's in Harley leather everything... not a single bike, or a single wrinkle in their brand new very shiny leathers... Have heard lots of other stories like that as well... I do have friends that trailer their bikes... but they live in places like Wyoming... if it wasnt' for the Toybox, they'd have about a 2 week riding season... I like all my bikes... they're all different and fun to ride in different ways. Now I have to find an old Triumph for my brother to rebuild..sheese...it never ends... Mary aka Snapdragon
Krashdagon aka Snappy
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 274
Adjunct
|
Adjunct
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 274 |
Bike riders are diverse in their characters just like other groups. You have the people who don't care what you ride or say, as long as you don't bash their family and the ones that think they and their machines are superior for some unknown reasons. Expect the people who think their's is best and your's sucks also to think that their poop doesn't stink. It's not as much about Harleys vs. Triumph as it is about people who feel strongly that it's their way or the highway. I'm a rider and think that if a person isn't a butthead or a dangerious idiot, they are more than welcome to hang with me. In every group (bikers included) there will be some buttheads and some idiots. It is just my preference to avoid those people as much as possible. Two Harley riders (man & woman in HD dress) saw me in Target last night (carrying my helmet) and asked if that was my beautiful Triumph outside. I said yes, and thanked them. While walking away the man said "keep the rubber side down and ride safe". Those are my kind of people. A little friendly picking is cool, but since I live in a glass house, I'll never start throwing rocks.
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,971
Loquacious
|
Loquacious
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,971 |
Quote:
Quote:
You have to give Harley credit for selling so many engines with that p*** poor / ancient engine design.
Yup, those terrible antiquey engines are really bad for business, they last way too long. They should be more like the Japanese made clones and fall apart so badly as to resist rebuilding in 5 years.
I spent some time Sunday with three premium level Harleys. I have to say, the quality and design in those Harleys I saw is outstanding. They reminded me of the grace and quality level of one of my favorites - the 50s & 60s Cadillacs, with no scrimping on the quality, and no forms that begged the question, "what were they thinking when they designed that" which is what I found with certain Triumph parts, (namely the Triumph Speedmaster crash bars, and heel & toe shifters.)
I retract the negative comments I made about the Harley brand. It was due to my ignorance.
|
|
|
 Re: What's the deal with Triumph v Harley Davidson
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,825
"Lighten up, Francis."
|
"Lighten up, Francis."
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,825 |
It's not the bikes. It's (some of) the people.
|
|
|
|
|