BonnevilleAmerica.com | Forums Home | AUP | Disclaimer
Check out the new Gallery
wicked red 1100
wicked red 1100
by mag10, August 21
Windshield I need to replace
Windshield I need to replace
by philwarner, May 10
first ride
first ride
by NemoJr, April 1
Steve McQueen inspired
Steve McQueen inspired
by Feral, November 28
GaRally22
GaRally22
by chy, September 18
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Ruling the Net.
#53969 04/14/2006 8:57 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 760
Simmer Offline OP
3/4 Throttle
OP Offline
3/4 Throttle
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 760
An article in Entripreneur Magazine stated that some nations including China and Cuba, believe the U.S. government has too much control of the internet. A non-profit corp. assigns names, numbers, and sets top-level domains along with prices. U.N. members propose to move control to a yet not-to-be-founded U.N. agency. Of course the U.S. does not want to turn over its governance of the net. My experience has shown that most of the internet virus problems come from China. The U.N. is corrupt at the highest levels and can't run anything let alone the internet. I believe the net is just fine the way it is, but if the world insists on change its governance the a separate international agency. NOT THE U.N.

Dave

Re: Ruling the Net.
Simmer #53970 04/14/2006 12:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 670
Adjunct
Offline
Adjunct
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 670
Maybe we could contact Al Gore and have him come up with an alternative, while we sell the net to the UN! Afterall, it's been quit a while since he invented it, so I'm sure he's come up with something better by this time!


But, what do I know?
Re: Ruling the Net.
panman60 #53971 04/14/2006 1:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 760
Simmer Offline OP
3/4 Throttle
OP Offline
3/4 Throttle
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 760
Dang!!! I forgot all about him.

Dave

Re: Ruling the Net.
Simmer #53972 04/14/2006 1:25 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 885
Likes: 2
3/4 Throttle
Offline
3/4 Throttle
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 885
Likes: 2
I'm not sure what your experience with viruses have to do with the control of DNS, since neither are related.. however, there have been numerious problems with ICANN's policies and control over TLD's, and their assignment of registrars for them in the past, including some countries who are not allowed to maintain their own DNS space and others whose control were arbitrarily handed to others for reasons other than technical control and ability. Remember, this is a global society, so really, decisions should be made by a global authority representing all interests.

Of course, there is nothing preventing the UN or any other organization from attempting to control the TLD DNS servers on the internet.. it is a cooperative venture between all involved. If enough momentium is obtained for alternative ccTLD servers run by another organization, there is nothing that ICANN or anybody else could really do about it. People will 'vote' with the TLD zone hint files in their control, and there isn't anything that can prevent them from doing so if it gets to that point.

Cheers,
Brad


To be old and wise, you must first be young and stupid.
Re: Ruling the Net.
MrUnix #53973 04/14/2006 1:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 670
Adjunct
Offline
Adjunct
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 670
Oh yeah, there ya go spoutin' all that foo & shebang trying to get a serious point across! Q: How many Unix Support staff does it take to screw in a light bulb? A: Read the man page! ....wahka, wahka, wahka!

Tom.


But, what do I know?
Re: Ruling the Net.
Simmer #53974 04/14/2006 2:07 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639
Likes: 3
Old Hand
Offline
Old Hand
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639
Likes: 3
We could tell them to sod off, resign from the UN, kick them out of New York and watch the whole outfit collapse for lack of (US) funding.


Let's hope there's intelligent life somewhere in space 'cause it's buggar all down here. -- Monte Python
Re: Ruling the Net.
Simmer #53975 04/14/2006 2:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,630
Likes: 7
Monkey Butt
Offline
Monkey Butt
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,630
Likes: 7
Poor little b@st@rds. Perhaps someone should remind them that the United States built the internet. The Department of Defence as a matter of fact. What they want is control of the content going into their countries. Funny how it's dictatorships demanding that the UN control the internet. The same UN that thinks Cuba and Iran should be on the human rights oversight committee.

If Cuba, China, and the UN want control let them set up a separate system and compete. Until then let 'em pi$$ off.


We all like to think of ourselves as rugged individualists. But when push comes to shove most of us are sheep who do what we are told. Worst of all, a lot of us become unpaid agents of whoever is controlling the agenda by enforcing the current dogma on the few rugged individualists who actually exist.
Re: Ruling the Net.
ladisney #53976 04/14/2006 3:08 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 885
Likes: 2
3/4 Throttle
Offline
3/4 Throttle
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 885
Likes: 2
the United States built the internet.

Not true.. while DARPA did fund a lot of the initial research, it by no means built the internet. If anything, it just planted the seed, and individuals, corporations, telcom providers and nations provided the resources necessary to make it what it is today. The internet is a colaborative venture between all involved and the costs of that venture is shared by all who participate. By having a private corporation in control, you basically have a control structure in place that does not represent those who it governs. If you live in the US or know it's history, then that should sound hauntingly familiar.

Cheers,
Brad


To be old and wise, you must first be young and stupid.
Re: Ruling the Net.
MrUnix #53977 04/14/2006 4:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,630
Likes: 7
Monkey Butt
Offline
Monkey Butt
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,630
Likes: 7
Quote:

the United States built the internet.

Not true.. while DARPA did fund a lot of the initial research, it by no means built the internet. If anything, it just planted the seed, and individuals, corporations, telcom providers and nations provided the resources necessary to make it what it is today. The internet is a colaborative venture between all involved and the costs of that venture is shared by all who participate. By having a private corporation in control, you basically have a control structure in place that does not represent those who it governs. If you live in the US or know it's history, then that should sound hauntingly familiar.

Cheers,
Brad



If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Somehow I don't think letting a supergovernmental organization that has a history of kowtowing to totalitarian dictatorships while doing nothing about repression and genocide, control the most effective communication system in history is a great idea. So far I’ve only seen two groups of people complaining about the overall governance of the Internet. Those who object to people in the US having the major control as a matter of principle (Some sort of Hegemonist plot don’t you know) And those who object to the free flow of information in and out of their countries (China, Cuba, and Iran come to mind) Certainly the DoD no longer controls the Internet and private organizations throughout the world have built it up over the last 20 years, but at it’s start it was an all American creature. Turning it over to the UN, or any other “World” governing body is a recipe for disaster. Right now the Internet is an instrument for freedom wielded primarily by hundreds of millions of individuals. Turning it over to the UN, or anything like it, will turn it into an instrument for control by those much less interested in freedom than in perpetuating corrupt regimes and enforcing political correctness.


We all like to think of ourselves as rugged individualists. But when push comes to shove most of us are sheep who do what we are told. Worst of all, a lot of us become unpaid agents of whoever is controlling the agenda by enforcing the current dogma on the few rugged individualists who actually exist.
Re: Ruling the Net.
ladisney #53978 04/14/2006 4:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,821
Bar Shake
Offline
Bar Shake
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,821
Yeah Larry, it's kind of like radio free Europe , Remember that?


Contra todo mal, mezcal; contra todo bien, también
Re: Ruling the Net.
ladisney #53979 04/14/2006 4:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 885
Likes: 2
3/4 Throttle
Offline
3/4 Throttle
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 885
Likes: 2
If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

That's the point.. it is broke.

Cheers,
Brad


To be old and wise, you must first be young and stupid.
Re: Ruling the Net. *DELETED*
Simmer #53980 04/14/2006 4:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,172
Saddle Sore
Offline
Saddle Sore
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,172
Post deleted by Grump


More flags More fun!
Re: Ruling the Net.
Deon #53981 04/14/2006 5:18 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 885
Likes: 2
3/4 Throttle
Offline
3/4 Throttle
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 885
Likes: 2
These countries that are complaining want to control and use technology after someone else does all the research and developement.

Nope, all they want an equal say in how ccTLDs are governed, not to control them. It's not really that radical of an idea and not like governing them in a DEMOCRATIC way would lead to world disaster, pandemonium, restrictions on free speech or anything even remotely similar.. it really is very much a non-issue and simply boils down to people wanting to have a say in a process that effects them. I find it hard to imagine how anyone would want otherwise. Heck, even our usually quiet northern neighbor has pulled support for ICCAN until they can resolve their problems.

Cheers,
Brad


To be old and wise, you must first be young and stupid.
Re: Ruling the Net. *DELETED*
MrUnix #53982 04/14/2006 5:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,172
Saddle Sore
Offline
Saddle Sore
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,172
Post deleted by Grump


More flags More fun!
Re: Ruling the Net.
Deon #53983 04/14/2006 6:48 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 885
Likes: 2
3/4 Throttle
Offline
3/4 Throttle
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 885
Likes: 2
So having an equal say is not a way to control something? I'm missing something here...

Apparently so You have the right to vote, do you not? Does that mean that you alone control the political process or the decisions made by that process?

I mean, WTF, are you actually advocating dictatorship (legislation without representation)?!?

Oh, and nowhere did I say this is a job for the UN, which you seem to imply..

Cheers,
Brad


To be old and wise, you must first be young and stupid.
Re: Ruling the Net.
MrUnix #53984 04/17/2006 4:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 760
Simmer Offline OP
3/4 Throttle
OP Offline
3/4 Throttle
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 760
At the risk of prolonging this. What I was trying to get accross about China and virus problems is that government encourages their people to make them. Because of that I wouldn't want them to have control if you can't trust them. I agree with those of you who believe we should pull the plug on the UN.

Dave


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4