 Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 20
Complete Newb
|
OP
Complete Newb
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 20 |
I'm new to motorcycling, just got my license this summer and bought my first bike,so I'm starting slow with trying to improve my bikes performance. I've been reading as much info on this site as possible and have decided to start making changes. I just yanked out the snorkel, what a worthless piece of junk that thing is. I'm sure removing that alone makes a big difference in air flow. I am going to put a bellmouth in the opening, and I may cut out the bottom of the air box as well. Obviously I need to replace the stock paper air filter, and that is where my question lies. Is there any difference in performance between the Uni or K&N? Is one better with bottom of the airbox gone than the other? Is there another filter that I am unaware of? Thank you in advance.
|
|
|
 Re: Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,227 Likes: 62
Fe Butt
|
Fe Butt
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,227 Likes: 62 |
If the K&N is gauze similar to the pods (not sure on this) it is cleanable and will flow well but won't filter as well as the Uni foam. The foam Uni is also cleanable but won't flow quite as well as the K&N. I run the K&N pods myself.
I learned all I need to know about life by killing smart people and eating their brains. Eat right ,Exercise ,Stay fit, Die Anyway!
|
|
|
 Re: Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,354
Learned Hand
|
Learned Hand
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,354 |
Jason, FWIW, I'd suggest you go with the Unifilter for now, before you start cutting up your airbox. It's a simple enough mod (and not too expensive), along with the Polaris bellmouth, that will help your engine breathe better. Ride it like that for a year or three, before you start doing major changes like removing the airbox, installing pods, etc.
Steve
Blue/White 2007 TBA, Thruxton needles, Unifilter, AI removed, Polaris Bellmouth, Bubs, Nology Coils/wires, Lightbar, Ricor Intiminators, Hagon Nitros, Tall Sissy Bar w/luggage rack, Dart flyscreen & Lowers. 130 Mains, TrueGel Battery MG12-BS.
|
|
|
 Re: Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 386
Adjunct
|
Adjunct
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 386 |
Personally I'd start with some subtle changes until you are comfortable riding the bike. +1 on the cheap upgrade air filter. then I'd get a set of mix screws from brent to replace the "D" screws if you have them and delete the AI. All pretty simple tasks and the members here are great for advice or walkthrough tips.
Then save up for a year or two and then pick up a set of pipes and go for the air box delete and battery relocation. Then if you really want to change things up you can bob the fender for a custom look... and on from there.
Welcome to the site and I hope this helps. NR
1982 Pontiac Trans Am...K.I.T.T. in progress.
"It looks like Darth Vaders bathroom in here..."
|
|
|
 Re: Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,063 Likes: 8
Loquacious
|
Loquacious
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,063 Likes: 8 |
Hello Jason,
Welcome to the site. Both filters are good quality. The Uni is considerably cheaper. You need to purchase the oil with the filter for the initial soaking.
I agree with what the others stated. Start simple. Make 1 change at a time. Make sure you keep up with the carb jetting as you increase the air flow into/out of the engine. Removing the snorkels (there are 3 on the early Americas) required that I up my mains and shim my needles. If you cut the bottom of the airbox, you might have to increase size again but run the small risk of getting water into the airbox during heavy rain riding. If you do open up the bottom of the box, it is reversible.
12 Rocket Roadster 03 Bonneville America 69 BSA Firebird Scrambler 73 Yamaha TX 750
|
|
|
 Re: Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,671 Likes: 15
Loquacious
|
Loquacious
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,671 Likes: 15 |
Quote:
...The foam Uni is also cleanable but won't flow quite as well as the K&N...
As a general rule, Uni pod filters flow better thsn K&N pods.
|
|
|
 Re: Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,227 Likes: 62
Fe Butt
|
Fe Butt
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,227 Likes: 62 |
I was speaking to the single OEM replacement and as stated I wasn't even sure of that since I went straight to the pods.
I learned all I need to know about life by killing smart people and eating their brains. Eat right ,Exercise ,Stay fit, Die Anyway!
|
|
|
 Re: Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,671 Likes: 15
Loquacious
|
Loquacious
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,671 Likes: 15 |
I can't reasonably foresee why a single stage Uni of any configuation wouldn't be capable of outflowing a K&N, all other things equal.
I currently run K&N pods on my SM, although I have run Uni's of different configurations on other bikes.
I will probably go to black foam single stage Uni pods on the SM at some point, too.
|
|
|
 Re: Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 20
Complete Newb
|
OP
Complete Newb
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 20 |
Thanks for the input guys.
I am also planning on debaffling my stock pipes as well, trying to decide on how many to remove at this point. And removing the AI seems like a worthwhile, cheap and easy job as well.
Is it recomended that I remove the 2 snorkels located inside the airbox as well?
|
|
|
 Re: Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,726
Loquacious
|
Loquacious
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,726 |
Both UNI and K&N will be noticeably better than stock. I doubt anyone can tell the difference between the two. I like the UNI as it is very easy to clean and re-oil. I only lightly oil but feel the oil helps in retaining small dust particles.
I'd try it with the new filter, bellmouth, and snorkel removed before cutting the bottom out. You may find that unnecessary. You may also need to change your main jet with the increased airflow.
The two snorkels on the inside were only on 04 or earlier models. Yes, remove them as well. They were taken off of all factory models by 2005.
Bob
2005 America, 904cc - sold. 2014 Trophy SE.
|
|
|
 Re: Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,227 Likes: 62
Fe Butt
|
Fe Butt
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,227 Likes: 62 |
Guys I wasn't speaking of a noticeable difference and have no data saying one flows better than the other. I just figured that oiled foam would flow less air than a gauze filter but not to the point of needing any re-jetting or anything. I also could be wrong about that as I originally stated.Personally for a stock air box I would probably choose the oiled foam but like the K&N for the pod application, again just my personal preference.
I learned all I need to know about life by killing smart people and eating their brains. Eat right ,Exercise ,Stay fit, Die Anyway!
|
|
|
 Re: Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 20
Complete Newb
|
OP
Complete Newb
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 20 |
ok, so all three of the snorkels have been yanked out, there remains a flimsy piece of plastic between where the two inner snorkels were. Should I cut this out, or leave it as is?
|
|
|
 Re: Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,726
Loquacious
|
Loquacious
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,726 |
Leave it as is and just remove the snorkels. The remaining plastic will make no difference.
Bob
2005 America, 904cc - sold. 2014 Trophy SE.
|
|
|
 Re: Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 711
Adjunct
|
Adjunct
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 711 |
Awright, folks, since we're talking about K&N pods -- I know the two "usual" pods to use for the Speedys etc are the K&N 2890 and 2900. Anybody try any other K&N pods, preferably with a flange angle to get the pod away from the nubbie things on the frame?
Also, what's the deal with the DNA pods, and can we get them here in the States (without it costing an arm and a leg)...
--Jaeger
NEUTIQUAM ERRO
|
|
|
 Re: Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 258
Adjunct
|
Adjunct
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 258 |
I personally can't really say much about the flow differences between uni and k&n. I do know that in the shop we see ALOT more bikes and atv's with the top ends worn out due to dust getting past k&n filters. Personally I think it's due to improper installation(not greasing the mating surface)and improper oiling. Granted this is a more serious issue with offroad bikes which comprise the bulk of our work. I personally prefer UNI over K&N, due to the ease of cleaning. Another good idea is to armorall the interior of the air box, the armorall atracts dust and keeps the filter clean significantly longer as well as making the box easier to clean. I also agree with making mods a step at a time and avoiding cutting the bottom out of the airbox,When you get caught in the rain you'll end up with a water soaked filter and a bike that wont run. I'm sure I'm not the only person here that experienced the joys of sitting beside the road in the rain atop a non functional bike.
Outside a dog a book is a mans best friend, inside a dog it's to dark to read.
|
|
|
 Re: Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,457
Learned Hand
|
Learned Hand
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,457 |
Quote:
...and I may cut out the bottom of the air box as well. Obviously I need to replace the stock paper air filter...
When I cut out the bottom of the airbox, I cut out the bottom of a stock paper filter. I had 3 baffles out of the pipes, 130 main jets, TBS needles, screws out 3 or 3 1/2 turns. The difference was remarkable. The tach would zip around and time to shift again. Learned the hard way about rain soaking the air filter. It took about 150 miles in steady, sometimes severe rain before the bike quit, however. I had to go the rest of the way with no air filter. When I got home, I simply dropped a stock air filter over the hole. I've since changed to quieter TOR's with milder jetting.
|
|
|
 Re: Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 20
Complete Newb
|
OP
Complete Newb
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 20 |
Thanks for the input I think I'm going to leave the airbox as is, the last thing I need is sitting on a roadside in the rain, and I should see plenty of benefit from a higher flow filter.
|
|
|
 Re: Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,726
Loquacious
|
Loquacious
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,726 |
Put in the UNI, and add a bellmouth. I guarantee you a noticable difference in airflow without modifying the box.
Bob
2005 America, 904cc - sold. 2014 Trophy SE.
|
|
|
 Re: Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,432 Likes: 1
Worn Saddle
|
Worn Saddle
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,432 Likes: 1 |
Quote:
I personally prefer UNI over K&N, due to the ease of cleaning.
Cleaning a K&N is pretty easy. You buy the $9 kit (good for multiple uses), spray the cleaner on the filter, wash it off, let it dry and re-oil.
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort. Herm Albright (1876 - 1944)
|
|
|
 Re: Uni vs K&N vs. ?
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,726
Loquacious
|
Loquacious
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,726 |
Quote:
Cleaning a K&N is pretty easy. You buy the $9 kit (good for multiple uses), spray the cleaner on the filter, wash it off, let it dry and re-oil.
Exactly the same for the UNI. I doubt there's any significant difference between the two.
You still on the road Ed? We have a show in Tuscaloosa Thursday with Bela Fleck. I'm definitely working less and enjoying it more by being selective. Don't depend on the company for income any more.
Bob
2005 America, 904cc - sold. 2014 Trophy SE.
|
|
|
|
|