 Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 711
Adjunct
|
OP
Adjunct
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 711 |
Ok, folks -- what'ya know about a new Triumph Scrambler, based on the T100, coming out in 2006? See possible pix here: http://www.sport-touring.net/forums/showthread.php?t=69818--Jaeger
NEUTIQUAM ERRO
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,164 Likes: 1
Should be Riding
|
Should be Riding
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,164 Likes: 1 |
I keep thinking that the rumor of that scrambler can't (or shouldn't) be true. Other than it being a retro style bike, it's a bike that doesn't make sense at all. Owning one would pretty much be a novelty and not practical at all. There is no way that it can compete/perform with modern dirt/enduro bikes. People that are using Triumphs for flat track are already customizing Bonnies to do the trick. Triumph already has the Tiger as a dual sport bike.
I read on some other forum that those pics are actually of Norman Hyde modified bikes.
But, I guess, next weekend, we will find out for sure.
However, I will say that it does look nice and reminds me of a late 60's early 70's enduro bike.
Soren
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,198 Likes: 1
Oil Expert
|
Oil Expert
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,198 Likes: 1 |
I saw a test bike go by when I was on a factory tour the other week. Didn't see it up close as I was in the parking lot, but it was very much the same as pictures in the link. Not sure if I would want one though
Nobby
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Hiya Soren
I think you're right - it would be a novelty machine.
I don't doubt it would be quite a good machine but I think it will be aimed at the rider who wants a cheap(ish) 2nd, 3rd ... bike to scratch around on that's also a bit different. I think it looks great and if it comes to light and looks like the ones in the pictures, I'd certainly like one to potter around on in the winter.
It's in the same vain as the Enfield range - they have an 'off-road' bullet. Someone will like it enough to want to buy one.
I suppose we should welcome any new machine whether or not we can afford one, want one or even if we don't like it because of the good it does the company.
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 711
Adjunct
|
OP
Adjunct
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 711 |
Hey, I know a buddy of mine who's looking to get his first "real" bike (he's on a beater first bike now) and he wants somethign that can actually function in the dirt, but mostly road, but he's wanted a Bonnie... this'll be perfect for him, depending on how it comes out!
--Jaeger
NEUTIQUAM ERRO
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
There you go! First one sold already!
As long as they don't get greedy and keep it priced near the Bonneville, I'd consider one as a second bike.
Logically, it needs to be parred down so no fancy double dials, chrome etc - just like the basic Bonnie. Just over 4 grand over here I believe.
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,518 Likes: 31
Loquacious
|
Loquacious
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,518 Likes: 31 |
Quote:
I keep thinking that the rumor of that scrambler can't (or shouldn't) be true. Other than it being a retro style bike, it's a bike that doesn't make sense at all.
Soren,
As much as what you say makes sense, I wouldn't be surprised if there is a new trend in the making, as was the case with the supermotard motorcycles. They were odd initially and now everyone is making them. I have noticed Voxan in France are also making a scrambler model. I am sure there is a market out there for "off-on" as opposed to "on-off" dual-purpose bikes ... or a market will be made for them.  The minute we see other manufacturers jump on the band-wagon we'll know (especially the Japanese). 
Bedouin.
Blessed are those eyes that have seen more roads than any man! (Homer).
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 6
Complete Newb
|
Complete Newb
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 6 |
I normally post over on MCUSA, but my take on this is the same as Soren's. While it's an interesting style exercise, I don't see who the intended market is.
I think this is what we've seen in lots of other bikes over the years: A bike that everyone will love ... and nobody will buy.
2001 Triumph Thunderbird, "Queen Bess"
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,734
Loquacious
|
Loquacious
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,734 |
I think the Japanese and others are already taking notice of this on-off vs off-on. The Suzuki V-Strom is made for 90% street-10% dirt as are other bikes like the Honda Varadero(not imported to the US), Ducati Multistrada, and the Triumph Tiger. Even Buell is trying to get in with the Ulysses. The only one missing from offering a bike of this kind is Kawasaki, but they had one in Europe that used Suzuki's DL100 motor before dropping it. These are all 2wd SUVs of the motorcycle kind.
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 711
Adjunct
|
OP
Adjunct
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 711 |
Hah! Looks liks it wasn't all B.S. -- see the "New Triumph" thread in here.
--Jaeger
NEUTIQUAM ERRO
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,518 Likes: 31
Loquacious
|
Loquacious
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,518 Likes: 31 |
SalMaglie,
I wasn't actually thinking of the current on-off offerings but was contemplating a trend similar to that of the supermotards (in terms of niche). Specifically that these scramblers would also be play-bikes but with off-road capabilities (some).
Expect the Honda "Rabbit"  Scrambler (using the Dominator 650cc or Transalp 650 twin engine) in 2-3 years.
Quote:
The only one missing from offering a bike of this kind is Kawasaki, but they had one in Europe that used Suzuki's DL100 motor before dropping it.
Unless you've picked up on something, it is currently on the market now (for the last 2 years, perhaps more) - it is called the Kawasaki KLV 1000 and is identical to the Suzuki DL1000 V-Strom (in fact they have a collaboration agreement [Suzuki-Kawasaki] on this model). There are very minor differences (only visible from close up) other than the color schemes (one of which is orange and black).
Quote:
These are all 2wd SUVs of the motorcycle kind.
Good description!
Bedouin.
Blessed are those eyes that have seen more roads than any man! (Homer).
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,734
Loquacious
|
Loquacious
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,734 |
Oh, I see what you mean now.
I thought I'd heard/read Kawasaki had dropped the KLV 1000 for 2006.
FWIW, I read advrider.com a bit and it seems like that crowd would like more bikes like the new BMW HP2. A lightwieght twin with 80 hp, and dirt worthy, but for less than 10 grand. If the Japanese can make 600cc sportbikes with 120hp for that much money, why not adventure bikes?...or so their reasoning goes.
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 503
Adjunct
|
Adjunct
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 503 |
The Scrambler makes more sense on dirt and gravel roads that the Tiger does. Triumph isn't touting it as a new enduro. It's no more impractical than the Thruxton...it isn't comnpetitive with any naked bike currently made now is it? I think the Scrambler would be a blast to have rather than the T100 or standard Bonneville.
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 711
Adjunct
|
OP
Adjunct
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 711 |
Whoops, I stand corrected -- looks like the new Scrambler will be something like $8k out of the box -- about what the T100 is. I guess that's about right... (sorry, had to squint at the picture a littel more)
--Jaeger
NEUTIQUAM ERRO
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,968 Likes: 1
Loquacious
|
Loquacious
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,968 Likes: 1 |
The Scrambler looks like it could be a fun bike to own but the $8K price tag might keep alot of people away including yours truly. I just wouldn't have that much opportunity to use the off road features. If I lived way out in the country with an abundance of dirt roads then it would be ideal.
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 711
Adjunct
|
OP
Adjunct
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 711 |
Woo hoo! Confirmation. On this and all the new Triumphs: (also posted on the Lounge room) http://www.triumph.co.uk/uk/3990.aspx--Jaeger
NEUTIQUAM ERRO
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639 Likes: 3
Old Hand
|
Old Hand
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639 Likes: 3 |
The power rating is a bit dissapointing. They should have used the T100 or Thruxton engine instead of the S/M.
Let's hope there's intelligent life somewhere in space 'cause it's buggar all down here. -- Monte Python
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,223
Big Bore
|
Big Bore
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,223 |
I showed my wife pictures of the Scrambler without saying anything about it, just said "What do you think about this one?"
She said "I didn't know Triumph made a dirt bike"
Dang, I love this woman!!!
"Never underestimate the power of human stupidity" - Robert Heinlein
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,630 Likes: 7
Monkey Butt
|
Monkey Butt
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,630 Likes: 7 |
Neat bike. Reminds me of the worst burn I ever had, off the pipes of a CL350 Honda Scrambler in about 1970 when a guy on a bike picked me up while I was hitch hiking in shorts. OUCH, hurt for weeks and left a scar for months.
We all like to think of ourselves as rugged individualists. But when push comes to shove most of us are sheep who do what we are told. Worst of all, a lot of us become unpaid agents of whoever is controlling the agenda by enforcing the current dogma on the few rugged individualists who actually exist.
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,096 Likes: 2
Fe Butt
|
Fe Butt
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,096 Likes: 2 |
Gee, Larry! I'll bet, before that nasty ol' burn, you had really cute legs, huh? Well....I mean cute enough to have some "GUY on a bike pick you up", at least, huh?  (sorry Bro...couldn't resist THAT one!)  Yeah, I think I still have a few burn scars remaining somewhere from that CL72 Honda Scrambler, I had back in the late '60s, too. But I just can't help liking this new Triumph version. I guess some kids never grow up! Dwight
Yep! Just like a good Single Malt Scotch, you might call me "an acquired taste" TOO.(among the many OTHER things you may care to call me, of course)
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,630 Likes: 7
Monkey Butt
|
Monkey Butt
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,630 Likes: 7 |
Actually the "Guy" was a neighbor kid a few years older than me (I was 15 or 16) But yes, my legs are very cute. So cute in fact that I had them covered with hair to minimize their attractive power  I still cringe thinking of my skin sticking to those pipes. If I were looking for an on/off road bike I would likely get that scrambler ahead of the Tiger or the BMW. It's lighter, cheaper, I wouldn't need a 36 inch inseam to ride it and it looks like a Triumph!
We all like to think of ourselves as rugged individualists. But when push comes to shove most of us are sheep who do what we are told. Worst of all, a lot of us become unpaid agents of whoever is controlling the agenda by enforcing the current dogma on the few rugged individualists who actually exist.
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,096 Likes: 2
Fe Butt
|
Fe Butt
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,096 Likes: 2 |
Larry, EXACTLY! That pretty much puts how I feel about the new Scrambler in the ol' nutshell, TOO! Lighter, shorter, less top-heavy than the modern dualies and WAY COOL retro looks.  Cheers, Dwight
Yep! Just like a good Single Malt Scotch, you might call me "an acquired taste" TOO.(among the many OTHER things you may care to call me, of course)
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 209
Adjunct
|
Adjunct
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 209 |
Let me know how you feel on this one because I am in this situation.
Would you pay 8K for a factory original concours restored 1969 "C" model or the same price for the new Triumph scrambler? I am leaning to the 1969 model.
Mad`
Last edited by Mad; 09/24/2005 7:28 PM.
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,096 Likes: 2
Fe Butt
|
Fe Butt
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,096 Likes: 2 |
Mad,
As I also own a '70 Bonnie that is "streettracked out"(kind of a dual-purpose thing too), that question is hard to answer. However, if you now own an America or Speedmaster, my impulse is to say, go for the '69. The joys are kind of different and yet the same.
An older Triumph(BTW, I would stick to a '66 thru '70 model, as they seem the most collectable and are the purest examples, in my view, of the breed) if sorted-out well, can be a fairly reliable mount, BUT it's never going to be a long-distance ride, like the newer ones are.
If you don't already own one of the new modern Bonnies, I'd say buy the new Scambler, as it's going to be a bike that you could conceivably go anywhere on, such as the Interstates or even the occassional back-road.
Which ever way you choose, you'll have NO problem enjoying yourself. As you probably know...owning a Triumph is just about the best way you'll EVER find that will get you that...LEGAL high!
Cheers, Dwight
Yep! Just like a good Single Malt Scotch, you might call me "an acquired taste" TOO.(among the many OTHER things you may care to call me, of course)
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 40
Greenhorn
|
Greenhorn
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 40 |
This is the bike I'm trying to convince my wife I HAVE to have. I keep telling her that I know I already have two Triumphs but I don't have a Scrambler. I am even saying pleeeeeease...
|
|
|
 Re: Triumph Scrambler 2006
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639 Likes: 3
Old Hand
|
Old Hand
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,639 Likes: 3 |
Since the '69 has a proper kick starter and can be fitted with a proper magneto, it would win hands down as far as I'm concerned.
Let's hope there's intelligent life somewhere in space 'cause it's buggar all down here. -- Monte Python
|
|
|
|
|