Check out the new Gallery
wicked red 1100
wicked red 1100
by mag10, August 21
Windshield I need to replace
Windshield I need to replace
by philwarner, May 10
first ride
first ride
by NemoJr, April 1
Steve McQueen inspired
Steve McQueen inspired
by Feral, November 28
GaRally22
GaRally22
by chy, September 18
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
#250834 03/29/2008 3:03 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 20
Complete Newb
OP Offline
Complete Newb
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 20
I have a 2007 Speedmaster and want to upgrade the exhaust. I think I've narrowed down to the TOR or the pipes from Bub (from British Customs). Either way I go I'd install do with the air box removal. Any suggestions? Do any of you guys have experience with either system? I'm looking for loud...but certainly not obnoxious. I want the engine to sound like an engine.

Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
Captain_Hilts #250835 03/29/2008 3:33 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,099
Loquacious
Offline
Loquacious
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,099
I have the BuBs, and really like 'em!
Pulled some pretty good #'s on the dyno
at last year's NH Rally. Here's a link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PwyOg-LKjk

Note: for optimum audio play on a system with a subwoofer

The read-outs for all the dyno's are posted with specs.

http://dinqua.com/Triumph/NHDynos/



Happy hunting!
Vroom, vroom
Uncle Charlie

Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
Captain_Hilts #250836 03/29/2008 3:50 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 426
Likes: 2
Adjunct
Offline
Adjunct
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 426
Likes: 2
Just got a set of short TOR fitted. Nice note to them loud but not stupid. Sounds real nice accelerating out of corners.

Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
Bodger #250837 03/29/2008 3:54 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,186
Likes: 55
Fe Butt
Offline
Fe Butt
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,186
Likes: 55
I personally don't like the TORs,I had a set on my bike and they are too tinny sounding to me and not loud enough. I have heard the Bubs and they sound OK but I like my gutted stockers better and they only cost me a little time.


I learned all I need to know about life by killing smart people and eating their brains.
Eat right ,Exercise ,Stay fit, Die Anyway!
Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
The_Dog33 #250838 03/29/2008 5:37 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 20
Complete Newb
OP Offline
Complete Newb
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 20
if I went the gutted route...how did you ensure that the performance wasn't negatively affected? that route is tempting since it's a pretty big upfront investment.

Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
unclecharlie #250839 03/29/2008 5:40 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 20
Complete Newb
OP Offline
Complete Newb
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 20
Uncle Charlie - did you go with an air box removal as well? What was the increased performance (hp) at the rear wheel? What was the impact to your overall fuel economy? and...if you don't mind me asking...what was the price of your pipes and where did you pick them up? By the way...the bike sounds great.

Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
Captain_Hilts #250840 03/29/2008 7:13 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,099
Loquacious
Offline
Loquacious
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,099
I have a stock air box with the snorkle removed, UNI filter
45/135 1 shim on a stock needle. I think I had 65.34rwhp and
about 50ft/lbs w/a pretty flat torque curve. The a/f curve
was pretty flat as well, but she runs a little on the rich side.
Rich is better than lean, and she pulls!

Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
unclecharlie #250841 03/29/2008 7:20 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,099
Loquacious
Offline
Loquacious
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,099
And if I wanted good fuel economy, I'd ride a moped.

Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
unclecharlie #250842 03/29/2008 11:47 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,060
Likes: 6
Worn Saddle
Offline
Worn Saddle
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,060
Likes: 6
I like my TORs. They give just a medium rumble at takeoff. But they are definately not loud.


Fidelis et Fortis
Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
Captain_Hilts #250843 03/30/2008 12:16 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,186
Likes: 55
Fe Butt
Offline
Fe Butt
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,186
Likes: 55
Quote:

if I went the gutted route...how did you ensure that the performance wasn't negatively affected? that route is tempting since it's a pretty big upfront investment.




Just be sure you don't remove the reducer cone where the pipes meet the headers. Then jet for where you live and amount of gutting.The reducer cone is important so you don't lose bottom end torque.


I learned all I need to know about life by killing smart people and eating their brains.
Eat right ,Exercise ,Stay fit, Die Anyway!
Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
The_Dog33 #250844 03/30/2008 2:02 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,354
Learned Hand
Offline
Learned Hand
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,354
I like me Bubs.

I almost went with TORs and am really glad I didn't. I'm hanging onto my stock pipes, just in case, and have no plans to gut them.


Blue/White 2007 TBA, Thruxton needles, Unifilter, AI removed, Polaris Bellmouth, Bubs, Nology Coils/wires, Lightbar, Ricor Intiminators, Hagon Nitros, Tall Sissy Bar w/luggage rack, Dart flyscreen & Lowers. 130 Mains, TrueGel Battery MG12-BS.
Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
Captain_Hilts #250845 03/30/2008 7:45 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,308
Likes: 4
Worn Saddle
Offline
Worn Saddle
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,308
Likes: 4
Let me add to this.
The Bubs, along with Thunderbike pipes, are, as far as I know for absolute certainty, the only two manufacturers that have actually spent a great deal of time and money tuning the pipes to balance perfectly with our bikes. Thus they are the ones that offer the best breathing and superior performance.
Now before everyone jumps all in my poop, rremember that the other guys (Sceptre, SS, Epco etc) all make mighty fine products, they have just not spent the time with dynos and engineers (not like mert that drive a train type engineer....) to tune their pipes for performance, they just sound better and some work just fine, just not as fine as Bubs or Thunderbike.
So, my vote is for the Bubs all the way.
I have also owned TORs, even have a spare set in the garage, (wanna sound like a fart machine? Use the TORs ) and now the Thunderbike pipes. If I had to get another set, they would be either the bubs or Thunderbike. Probably the bubs since I already have the Tpipes. They were actually what I was trying to get when I bought my Tpipes, but Bubs were very hard to come by and slow in the manufacture end for the long slash cuts. By the way, the Bubs are also the pipes that Bill Gately ( Bonneville Performance ) receoomend for his Mikuni HSR42 setups.


A word to the wise is not necessary. It is the stupid ones who need the advice. Pat
Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
Dinqua #250846 03/30/2008 11:02 AM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,060
Likes: 6
Worn Saddle
Offline
Worn Saddle
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,060
Likes: 6
Quote:

Let me add to this.
The Bubs, along with Thunderbike pipes, are, as far as I know for absolute certainty, the only two manufacturers that have actually spent a great deal of time and money tuning the pipes to balance perfectly with our bikes. Thus they are the ones that offer the best breathing and superior performance.
Now before everyone jumps all in my poop, rremember that the other guys (Sceptre, SS, Epco etc) all make mighty fine products, they have just not spent the time with dynos and engineers (not like mert that drive a train type engineer....) to tune their pipes for performance, they just sound better and some work just fine, just not as fine as Bubs or Thunderbike.
So, my vote is for the Bubs all the way.
I have also owned TORs, even have a spare set in the garage, (wanna sound like a fart machine? Use the TORs ) and now the Thunderbike pipes. If I had to get another set, they would be either the bubs or Thunderbike. Probably the bubs since I already have the Tpipes. They were actually what I was trying to get when I bought my Tpipes, but Bubs were very hard to come by and slow in the manufacture end for the long slash cuts. By the way, the Bubs are also the pipes that Bill Gately ( Bonneville Performance ) receoomend for his Mikuni HSR42 setups.


Is that why my friends have been calling me an "old fart" lately. Now if I could just rigg it for some smell, I'd be really annoying and happy!


Fidelis et Fortis
Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
The_Dog33 #250847 03/30/2008 11:48 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 20
Complete Newb
Offline
Complete Newb
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 20
denniskirk.com bubs $398

Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
1959tr6 #250848 03/30/2008 2:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,382
Learned Hand
Offline
Learned Hand
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,382
Fast Eddy sells 'em

Fast Eddy

Pretty sure it includes shipping. Eddy you there????? Hello?????


Tony G '03 America
Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
TonyG #250849 03/30/2008 11:23 PM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,354
Learned Hand
Offline
Learned Hand
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,354
Found these Bubs on eBay, if you haven't seen them yet: Bub Exhaust on eBay


Blue/White 2007 TBA, Thruxton needles, Unifilter, AI removed, Polaris Bellmouth, Bubs, Nology Coils/wires, Lightbar, Ricor Intiminators, Hagon Nitros, Tall Sissy Bar w/luggage rack, Dart flyscreen & Lowers. 130 Mains, TrueGel Battery MG12-BS.
Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
Captain_Hilts #250850 03/31/2008 2:32 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,172
Saddle Sore
Offline
Saddle Sore
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,172
I had the long TOR's on my bike for awhile. After a couple thousand miles they got really raspy sounding. Not so much deep, just loud. Sorta like a VW Beetle with a glasspak.
I'd look elsewhere for making the engine "sound like an engine"...


More flags More fun!
Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
Deon #250851 03/31/2008 10:09 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 517
Adjunct
Offline
Adjunct
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 517
BUBS make my bike for me. Love them.

Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
TonyG #250852 04/03/2008 7:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 3
Learned Hand
Offline
Learned Hand
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 3

Quote:

Pretty sure it includes shipping. Eddy you there????? Hello?????



Yes, I am here, My rpice that I cannot list on my site is $398 with shipping included just like Dennis Kirk...but they doesn't have the advertising rules I do...I guess.


[color:"blue"] www.fasteddysports.com [/color]
Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
Fasteddy #250853 04/03/2008 9:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 570
Adjunct
Offline
Adjunct
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 570
Eddy....can you supply the chrome solo rear fender rack. I'm relatively new here and need one as well as a few other items. Thanks. Don

I like the tubular one.

Last edited by Shutterbug; 04/03/2008 9:45 PM.

"You're a long time underground!"
Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
Fasteddy #250854 04/04/2008 9:59 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 20
Complete Newb
OP Offline
Complete Newb
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 20
Thanks for the info. I'd be interested to find out if anyone has heard the bub pipes on a speedmaster or america next to the SS pipes from Dale. Are the bubs or SS louder? Does one system have a deeper tone than the other?

Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
Conwy #250855 04/04/2008 6:58 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,099
Loquacious
Offline
Loquacious
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,099
I like my Bubs so much that I snagged these for back-up.
Actually, Bucky got 'em for me 'cause I'm not an Ebayer

Quote:

Found these Bubs on eBay, if you haven't seen them yet: Bub Exhaust on eBay



Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
Captain_Hilts #250856 04/04/2008 7:13 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,150
Oil Expert
Offline
Oil Expert
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,150
I'm also interested Capt in knowing what the bubs sound like cos if they aren't too loud or obnoxious I'll probably buy a set cos I want my bike to be able to breath properly and I don't think the Tors I inherited cut it in this area.

Anyway, can anyone tell me if this is indicative of what bubs sound like cos they do sound pretty loud. Mind you, I wouldn't mind so much if I could find a set of good breathing pipes that were acceptable when plugging along but louder when the throttle is given a fist full.

BTW, I've just asked Eddy for a quote to send bubs from the US to Aus as his prices are as usual very competitive and, I know he works Really hard at keeping freight cost down.


Staintune Pipes, K&N Pods, 45 pilots, TBS needles and 145 mains.
Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
Stacka #250857 04/04/2008 7:27 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,099
Loquacious
Offline
Loquacious
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,099
The Bubs in this clip appear to be "Dresser Dogs", which I
don't think are available anymore. They do sound good tho!

Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
unclecharlie #250858 04/04/2008 8:00 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,150
Oil Expert
Offline
Oil Expert
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,150
Do you have bubs charlie cos I can look at your youtube clip to hear what they sound like if that's the case?


Staintune Pipes, K&N Pods, 45 pilots, TBS needles and 145 mains.
Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
Stacka #250859 04/04/2008 8:59 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,099
Loquacious
Offline
Loquacious
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,099
I have the Bubs slashcuts, and that's what's on the vid clip
on the dyno. I had a set of what I think were the first
edition of the short TORs. They sounded so bad I gave them
away, and paid the shipping just to get them out of my shop.

I've heard most of the available choices side by side with
the Bubs. I think the Thunderbikes sound the best, slightly
deeper than the Bubs, and a little quieter, but they cost
twice as much, and don't give as much performance gain.

Rob's SS's sounded good, side by side, in his garage,
But I think the Bubs give you a little more grunt, when
set up right.

I'm no expert, but I know what I like. I like the Bubs.
Uncle Charlie

Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
unclecharlie #250860 04/05/2008 11:27 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 94
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 94
I LIKE my Bub's


03 TBA Bubs AI Removed 132 1 shim 3 1/2 turns
Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
unclecharlie #250861 04/05/2008 8:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,150
Oil Expert
Offline
Oil Expert
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,150
Thanks Charlie, I believe you are pretty accurate when you said


Quote:

I think the Thunderbikes sound the best, slightly
deeper than the Bubs, and a little quieter, but they cost
twice as much, and don't give as much performance gain




Also another factor that has scared me away from the thunderbikes is how a number of our fellas have said they have had quality issues with the chroming. Well for the sort of money they want I'm not about to risk it.

Finally, the bubs have Pat's tick of approval, and just think, to know that when I'm tuning up my bike, I will be able to get the best potential from her possible. That has to be a good feeling .

BTW, Fast Eddy again has done his research and given me a top quote to ship them to my place in Aus. So now it's getting very close to decision time and I haven't even mentioned it to my missus



Staffo


Staintune Pipes, K&N Pods, 45 pilots, TBS needles and 145 mains.
Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
Stacka #250862 04/05/2008 9:26 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,099
Loquacious
Offline
Loquacious
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,099
I've had the pleasure of meeting Pat many times,
He knows what he's talking about, and I've learned a lot from him.
Plus he's a great guy.

Eddy is a great guy as well, and an asset to this site.
Haven't met him in person yet, but we talked on the phone.
He helped me get some shocks in a hurry for a CT tech day.

Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
unclecharlie #250863 04/06/2008 1:06 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 20
Complete Newb
OP Offline
Complete Newb
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 20
Thanks again for all the info guys. Does anyone know if the bubs baffles are easy to remove and re-pack if I want to quiet them down a bit. Sounds like this isn't a problem with the SSs. A horrible decision to make without actually being able to hear the pipes on your model of bike first....ARGH!!!

Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
Captain_Hilts #250864 04/06/2008 10:12 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 129
Adjunct
Offline
Adjunct
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 129
Why would you want to quiet them down?!? They sound great loud. There are two rivets holding the baffles in and they are pretty easy to remove. I took mine out to make it louder, not quieter, so am not sure how easy it would be to put new rivets or bolts in, but I can't imagine its too bad.


My '07 "For three days after death hair and fingernails continue to grow, but phone calls taper off." Johnny Carson
Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
smokeinhiseyes #250865 04/06/2008 10:16 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 129
Adjunct
Offline
Adjunct
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 129
P.S., agreed, making a decision on hundreds of dollars on pipes without hearing them first sucks. The sound bites online weren't really all that helpful. Made the TORs sound decent (which they aren't!), and doesn't do justice to the bubs (which I think sound better than the recorded sound bites).


My '07 "For three days after death hair and fingernails continue to grow, but phone calls taper off." Johnny Carson
Re: Bub vs. Triumph Off Road
smokeinhiseyes #250866 04/06/2008 10:26 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,186
Likes: 55
Fe Butt
Offline
Fe Butt
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,186
Likes: 55
I agree, sound bytes don't give a good representation ,especially if you are looking to hear how loud they will be. If you turn your volume up they sound loud if you turn your volume down not so loud.I have short slash cut TORs that I had on my SM and I didn't like the sound at all. Too quiet and kinda if tin can sounding. Didn't sound bad when I was hard on the throttle though. I had the straight through type.


I learned all I need to know about life by killing smart people and eating their brains.
Eat right ,Exercise ,Stay fit, Die Anyway!

Moderated by  bennybmn, chy 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4