Check out the new Gallery
wicked red 1100
wicked red 1100
by mag10, August 21
Windshield I need to replace
Windshield I need to replace
by philwarner, May 10
first ride
first ride
by NemoJr, April 1
Steve McQueen inspired
Steve McQueen inspired
by Feral, November 28
GaRally22
GaRally22
by chy, September 18
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
leatherworks 112 or 112 +2 / passenger comfort?
#205270 09/24/2007 5:03 PM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 72
iron44 Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 72
Hey All:
I have read the postings, believe me, and I have yet to see an answer related to these bags and passenger comfort. Can anyone help a brother out here? Do the larger 112+2 bags impact a passenger; touching the legs of the passenger at all? My wife has fairly short legs and she would rather not have them rubbing up against her while traveling.

Thanks all!!

Re: leatherworks 112 or 112 +2 / passenger comfort?
iron44 #205271 09/24/2007 5:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,606
Likes: 2
Loquacious
Offline
Loquacious
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,606
Likes: 2
I have GINORMOUS bags and my bride is about 5-6" not short but not tall...she fits around them fine and I have never heard a complaint...BUT I have MOVER my passenger pegs to the exhaust bracket bolt location (lower forward bolt on the stock peg hangers) see below....



THE VOICE OF REASON per: Stewart AF&AM/Shriner/Scoutmaster 130/45 TBS 2shim SS Uni 18/42
Re: leatherworks 112 or 112 +2 / passenger comfort?
RobBA05 #205272 09/24/2007 7:54 PM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 72
iron44 Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 72
Doh! The thought never occurred to my simple mind... I just went down and checked it out. You helped me seal the deal. Thanks Man!


Moderated by  Dinqua, freedom, moe 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Rides
2025 Arkansas Rally
by roadworthy - 04/24/2025 7:57 PM
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4